Exploring the Feature Space for Cross-Domain Assessing the Complexity of Russian-Language Texts

The assessment of text complexity is a significant applied problem with potential applications in drafting legal doc-uments, editing textbooks, and selecting books for extracurricular reading. Different task formulations give rise to various types of text complexity that are weakly correlated. Despite this, re-searchers typically overlook cross-domain complexity assessment. This study evaluates the applicability of various linguistic features in assessing the complexity of Russian-language texts, adding two new groups of features (rhythmic and cohesion) to those previously studied and introducing a new group of features for lexical complexity. We perform both in-domain and cross-domain comparisons of the features. Our findings indicate that syntactic features are the most significant in terms of Mutual Information. In the in-domain context, lexical and morphological features were found to be the most beneficial, whereas in the cross-domain context, syntactic, morphological, and lexical features proved to be the most effective. Conversely, rhythmic and cohesion features did not significantly impact the quality of the assessment algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ispras64596.2024.10899137
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Feature Space for Cross-Domain Assessing the Complexity of Russian-Language Texts

Ksenia Lagutina, Dmitry Morozov, Anna Glazkova, Timur Garipov et al.
1 citations
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
0.35
article

Exploring the Feature Space for Cross-Domain Assessing the Complexity of Russian-Language Texts

Ksenia Lagutina, Dmitry Morozov, Anna Glazkova, Timur Garipov, Grigory Drozhashchikh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The assessment of text complexity is a significant applied problem with potential applications in drafting legal doc-uments, editing textbooks, and selecting books for extracurricular reading. Different task formulations give rise to various types of text complexity that are weakly correlated. Despite this, re-searchers typically overlook cross-domain complexity assessment. This study evaluates the applicability of various linguistic features in assessing the complexity of Russian-language texts, adding two new groups of features (rhythmic and cohesion) to those previously studied and introducing a new group of features for lexical complexity. We perform both in-domain and cross-domain comparisons of the features. Our findings indicate that syntactic features are the most significant in terms of Mutual Information. In the in-domain context, lexical and morphological features were found to be the most beneficial, whereas in the cross-domain context, syntactic, morphological, and lexical features proved to be the most effective. Conversely, rhythmic and cohesion features did not significantly impact the quality of the assessment algorithms.

ITMO University (RU), Novosibirsk State University (RU), Yaroslavl State University (RU), University of Tyumen (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Feature Space for Cross-Domain Assessing the Complexity of Russian-Language Texts — Ksenia Lagutina, Dmitry Morozov, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS