Antimicrobial resistance among WHO priority pathogens in community settings and understanding the perception and determinants leading to antimicrobial (mis)use in rural settings of Odisha
Results:The AMR genes found among the GBS strains were: tet (tetO n = 61, 39%; tetM n = 37, 24%), erm (ermB n = 41, 26%; ermA n = 20, 13%), ant(6)-Ia (n = 18, 11%) and lnuC (n = 1, 1%).Nineteen (12%) GBS strains were multidrug resistant.SAU strains harbored the following AMR genes: norA (n = 86, 64%), tet (tet38 n = 85, 63%; tetK n = 19, 14%; tetL n = 2, 1%), blaZ (n = 79, 59%), fosB1 (n = 44, 32%), ermC (n = 4, 3%), msrA (n = 2, 1%) and mecA (n = 1, <1%).mecA encodes an alternative penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a) that confers high-level resistance to methicillin (methicillin-resistant S. aureus, MRSA).Among all SAU strains, 71% (n = 96) were multidrug resistant.Over the years, AMR rates increased in SAU and GBS strains.Conclusion: Most GBS and S. aureus strains are resistant to antibiotics commonly used for treatment (human and veterinary medicine) and growth promotion in Brazil, highlighting the detection of MRSA and clindamycin-resistant GBS strains which are recognized as global public health threats.Thus, long-term surveillance of drug-resistant GBS and SAU strains is needed to guide local farmers and policymakers on CBM control practices, including antibiotic choice.
Authors
- Matrujyoti Pattnaik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8614-2920)
- Sanghamitra Pati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7717-5592)
- Debaprasad Parai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0266-5623)
- Amgoth Srinivas Nayak
- Dr Debaprasad Parai
Institutions
- Regional Medical Research Centre (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2025-02-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107490
- Primary Topic
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00