Quantifying the detection likelihood of faint peaks in interferometric data through jackknifing

Context . False-positive emission-line detections bias our understanding of astronomical sources; for example, falsely identifying z ∼ 3–4 passive galaxies as z > 10 galaxies leads to incorrect number counts and flawed tests of cosmology. Aims . In this work, we provide a novel but simple tool to better quantify the detection of faint lines in interferometric data sets and properly characterize the underlying noise distribution. We demonstrate the method on three sets of archival observations of z > 10 galaxy candidates, taken with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA). Methods . By jackknifing the visibilities using our tool, jackknify , we create observation-specific noise realizations of the interferometric measurement set. We apply a line-finding algorithm to both the noise cubes and the real data and determine the likelihood that any given positive peak is a real signal by taking the ratio of the two sampled probability distributions. Results . We show that the previously reported, tentative emission-line detections of these z > 10 galaxy candidates are consistent with noise. We further expand upon the technique and demonstrate how to properly incorporate prior information on the redshift of the candidate from auxiliary data, such as from the James Webb Space Telescope. Conclusions . Our work highlights the need to achieve a significance of ≳ 5 σ to confirm an emission line when searching in broad 30 GHz bandwidths. Using our publicly available method enables the quantification of false detection likelihoods, which are crucial for accurately interpreting line detections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451927
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the detection likelihood of faint peaks in interferometric data through jackknifing

Francesco Valentino, Joshiwa van Marrewijk, Melanie Kaasinen, Luca Di Mascolo et al.
1 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
1.33
article

Quantifying the detection likelihood of faint peaks in interferometric data through jackknifing

Francesco Valentino, Joshiwa van Marrewijk, Melanie Kaasinen, Luca Di Mascolo, Ilsang Yoon, Leindert Boogaard, G. Popping, Tony Mroczkowski, Tom J. L. C. Bakx
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Context . False-positive emission-line detections bias our understanding of astronomical sources; for example, falsely identifying z ∼ 3–4 passive galaxies as z > 10 galaxies leads to incorrect number counts and flawed tests of cosmology. Aims . In this work, we provide a novel but simple tool to better quantify the detection of faint lines in interferometric data sets and properly characterize the underlying noise distribution. We demonstrate the method on three sets of archival observations of z > 10 galaxy candidates, taken with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA). Methods . By jackknifing the visibilities using our tool, jackknify , we create observation-specific noise realizations of the interferometric measurement set. We apply a line-finding algorithm to both the noise cubes and the real data and determine the likelihood that any given positive peak is a real signal by taking the ratio of the two sampled probability distributions. Results . We show that the previously reported, tentative emission-line detections of these z > 10 galaxy candidates are consistent with noise. We further expand upon the technique and demonstrate how to properly incorporate prior information on the redshift of the candidate from auxiliary data, such as from the James Webb Space Telescope. Conclusions . Our work highlights the need to achieve a significance of ≳ 5 σ to confirm an emission line when searching in broad 30 GHz bandwidths. Using our publicly available method enables the quantification of false detection likelihoods, which are crucial for accurately interpreting line detections.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 695
Leiden University (NL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), European Southern Observatory (DE), University of Groningen (NL), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), National Radio Astronomy Observatory (US), Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE), Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Horizon 2020
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.