Errors in Measuring Height Differences in Engineering

For classic geodetic instruments, sources of errors influencing the total measurement error were determined. In digital levels, the technique of comparing the current image of the graduated rod with the saved picture of the graduated rod is used to read the rod. This reading technique eliminates the subjective influence (operator's error), but an error occurs from comparing two images. Apart from this source of errors, several errors in rod reading are not present at classical levels. Experimental measurements with digital levels have proven that certain sources of errors, which other authors also processed, can be significant concerning the accuracy of measurements. For example, illumination at 45° or steeper angles can cause reading errors more than ten times the measurement error at the station. Or, that inhomogeneous illumination of some parts of the rod causes large measurement errors, up to a few millimetres. One source of error has not been considered so far - this is the error that arises from incorrect sighting on the rod. Experimental measurements confirmed that misalignment caused an error of the order of tenths of a millimeter, and which can be larger than the measurement error at the station. It was also confirmed that this error is not characteristic only for one type of digital level, but it is already being reported in all. This error can be greater than the mean error of measuring the height difference at the station, which is significant in engineering works where height/height difference is often measured or marked using only one station.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20240707001833
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Errors in Measuring Height Differences in Engineering

Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Errors in Measuring Height Differences in Engineering

article en

Abstract

For classic geodetic instruments, sources of errors influencing the total measurement error were determined. In digital levels, the technique of comparing the current image of the graduated rod with the saved picture of the graduated rod is used to read the rod. This reading technique eliminates the subjective influence (operator's error), but an error occurs from comparing two images. Apart from this source of errors, several errors in rod reading are not present at classical levels. Experimental measurements with digital levels have proven that certain sources of errors, which other authors also processed, can be significant concerning the accuracy of measurements. For example, illumination at 45° or steeper angles can cause reading errors more than ten times the measurement error at the station. Or, that inhomogeneous illumination of some parts of the rod causes large measurement errors, up to a few millimetres. One source of error has not been considered so far - this is the error that arises from incorrect sighting on the rod. Experimental measurements confirmed that misalignment caused an error of the order of tenths of a millimeter, and which can be larger than the measurement error at the station. It was also confirmed that this error is not characteristic only for one type of digital level, but it is already being reported in all. This error can be greater than the mean error of measuring the height difference at the station, which is significant in engineering works where height/height difference is often measured or marked using only one station.

Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical GazetteVol. 32(2)
University of Novi Sad (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.