Potential Racial Bias During Pediatric Emergency Care: A Simulation Study

Objectives Despite education to help reduce differences in care, minorities continue to have worse health outcomes. Implicit biases are known to contribute to disparities in healthcare, even in pediatric populations. Prior simulation studies have used computer simulations or standardized patient encounters to understand the potential role of implicit bias in patient interactions. High-fidelity simulation is another method for evaluating patient management decisions in a controlled environment. This study aimed to evaluate whether high-fidelity simulation could reveal differences in pediatric patient management decisions during an emergency based on the skin color of a pediatric manikin. Methods A standard simulation scenario was created for a pediatric sepsis case. Nineteen first-year pediatric residents in their first month of internship were offered the opportunity to participate, and informed consent was obtained for our study approved by CHRISTUS Health. Participants were not made aware that the study involved any evaluation related to manikin skin color. Enrolled participants were randomized to run through the scenario with either a dark or light skin manikin with a standardized patient of the same skin tone playing the role of the parent. After simulations were completed, videos were analyzed by physician graders with a standardized evaluation form documenting interventions and timing. Results The majority of care was not statistically different for both light- and dark-skinned manikins in the sepsis simulation. However, there were some significant differences noted. All of the dark-skinned infants received oxygen while only 55.5% (5/9) of the light-skinned infants received oxygen (p = 0.03). Additionally, 89% (8/9) of the light-skinned infants received compressions after asystole occurred while only 40% (4/10) of the dark-skinned infants received compressions (p = 0.05). Discussion In a simulated pediatric sepsis case, there were significant differences in some interventions on the basis of skin color. While we can only theorize about the reason for these, they may have resulted from assumptions of different etiologies of the emergencies or unconscious reactions to the color of the manikin. Simulation is a unique approach to evaluate this important topic using standardized simulations and evaluation tools, and we intend to use these results to hone further research investigating reasons for the identified differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.79843
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential Racial Bias During Pediatric Emergency Care: A Simulation Study

Jendi Haug, Kellie Williams, Shad Deering, Elizabeth Byrne et al.
Cureus
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Potential Racial Bias During Pediatric Emergency Care: A Simulation Study

Jendi Haug, Kellie Williams, Shad Deering, Elizabeth Byrne, Vaishnavi J. Patel
article en

Abstract

Objectives Despite education to help reduce differences in care, minorities continue to have worse health outcomes. Implicit biases are known to contribute to disparities in healthcare, even in pediatric populations. Prior simulation studies have used computer simulations or standardized patient encounters to understand the potential role of implicit bias in patient interactions. High-fidelity simulation is another method for evaluating patient management decisions in a controlled environment. This study aimed to evaluate whether high-fidelity simulation could reveal differences in pediatric patient management decisions during an emergency based on the skin color of a pediatric manikin. Methods A standard simulation scenario was created for a pediatric sepsis case. Nineteen first-year pediatric residents in their first month of internship were offered the opportunity to participate, and informed consent was obtained for our study approved by CHRISTUS Health. Participants were not made aware that the study involved any evaluation related to manikin skin color. Enrolled participants were randomized to run through the scenario with either a dark or light skin manikin with a standardized patient of the same skin tone playing the role of the parent. After simulations were completed, videos were analyzed by physician graders with a standardized evaluation form documenting interventions and timing. Results The majority of care was not statistically different for both light- and dark-skinned manikins in the sepsis simulation. However, there were some significant differences noted. All of the dark-skinned infants received oxygen while only 55.5% (5/9) of the light-skinned infants received oxygen (p = 0.03). Additionally, 89% (8/9) of the light-skinned infants received compressions after asystole occurred while only 40% (4/10) of the dark-skinned infants received compressions (p = 0.05). Discussion In a simulated pediatric sepsis case, there were significant differences in some interventions on the basis of skin color. While we can only theorize about the reason for these, they may have resulted from assumptions of different etiologies of the emergencies or unconscious reactions to the color of the manikin. Simulation is a unique approach to evaluate this important topic using standardized simulations and evaluation tools, and we intend to use these results to hone further research investigating reasons for the identified differences.

CureusVol. 17(2)
Children's Hospital of San Antonio (US), Children's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of the Incarnate Word (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.