Defining and Evaluating the Impact of Bleeding Severity on Time to Endoscopy and Mortality Risk: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

<b>Background:</b> Upper gastrointestinal bleeding severity (BleSev) is commonly defined by evaluating different factors that are frequently interdependent on each other, expressing the same underlying cause. <b>Aim:</b> This study aimed to define the severity of a bleeding event and verify its impact on death risk and the time to endoscopy. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed 12 factors (demographic, hemodynamic, biochemical, and clinical) that could be associated with BleSev. We identified the independent weight of each factor in predicting a composite endpoint (need for surgery, interventional radiology, and death) and the effect of the interactions between time to endoscopy and BleSev on death risk. <b>Results:</b> Clinical data of 2.525 patients were included. Of the 12 factors, 5 were retained in the final model as follows: altered mental status, systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg, blood urea nitrogen level ≥ 130 mg/dL, hematemesis, and hemoglobin level ≤ 8 g/dL (AUC performance curve, 0.79). We identified the following three classes of BleSev: low (0-1 points, 2.4%), intermediate (3-4 points, 8.6%), and high (≥5 points, 21.1%). When no factors were present, the death risk was 1%; when all factors were present, the risk was 45.5%. Notably, the death risk increased with BleSev but was generally independent of time to endoscopy. However, in high-risk cases, early endoscopy (within 6-12 h) was associated with a reduced mortality rate. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study defines a risk model for BleSev and highlights the need for targeted endoscopic timing strategies based on BleSev for optimizing survival rates. Patients in the highest risk category may benefit from more urgent endoscopic interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051643
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining and Evaluating the Impact of Bleeding Severity on Time to Endoscopy and Mortality Risk: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Riccardo Marmo, C. Marmo, Marco Soncini, Maria Elena Riccioni et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
1.81
article

Defining and Evaluating the Impact of Bleeding Severity on Time to Endoscopy and Mortality Risk: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Riccardo Marmo, C. Marmo, Marco Soncini, Maria Elena Riccioni, Cristina Bucci
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Upper gastrointestinal bleeding severity (BleSev) is commonly defined by evaluating different factors that are frequently interdependent on each other, expressing the same underlying cause. <b>Aim:</b> This study aimed to define the severity of a bleeding event and verify its impact on death risk and the time to endoscopy. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed 12 factors (demographic, hemodynamic, biochemical, and clinical) that could be associated with BleSev. We identified the independent weight of each factor in predicting a composite endpoint (need for surgery, interventional radiology, and death) and the effect of the interactions between time to endoscopy and BleSev on death risk. <b>Results:</b> Clinical data of 2.525 patients were included. Of the 12 factors, 5 were retained in the final model as follows: altered mental status, systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg, blood urea nitrogen level ≥ 130 mg/dL, hematemesis, and hemoglobin level ≤ 8 g/dL (AUC performance curve, 0.79). We identified the following three classes of BleSev: low (0-1 points, 2.4%), intermediate (3-4 points, 8.6%), and high (≥5 points, 21.1%). When no factors were present, the death risk was 1%; when all factors were present, the risk was 45.5%. Notably, the death risk increased with BleSev but was generally independent of time to endoscopy. However, in high-risk cases, early endoscopy (within 6-12 h) was associated with a reduced mortality rate. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study defines a risk model for BleSev and highlights the need for targeted endoscopic timing strategies based on BleSev for optimizing survival rates. Patients in the highest risk category may benefit from more urgent endoscopic interventions.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(5)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), CTO Hospital (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Alessandro Manzoni Hospital (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
1.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.