Reshaping Agriculture Eco-efficiency in China: From Greenhouse Gas Perspective

• A more reasonable agricultural eco-efficiency indicator system is defined by including methane and nitrous oxide emission. • The ecological impacts of non-CO 2 emissions are underestimated. • Agricultural eco-efficiency of the northwest in China is higher than the southeast. • Quantitative insights into agricultural eco-efficiency in different regions is provided. Incorporating emissions of greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide into the metrics for agricultural eco-efficiency is critical for addressing climate change, given the significant role of agriculture in global emissions. Existing studies more focus on single carbon emission indicators and overlooks emissions of other significant greenhouse gases in measuring agricultural eco-efficiency, such as methane and nitrous oxide, leading to a potential underestimation of the true ecological impact of agricultural practices. Utilizing a dataset spanning 2000 to 2021 from China, this study for the first time includes methane and nitrous oxide in the assessment of agricultural eco-efficiency with SBM-DEA model, which defines a more standardized and accurate indicator system of agricultural eco-efficiency, and provides a more comprehensive framework for assessing the impact of agriculture on the environment. Furthermore, it rigorously assesses the variations in China’s agricultural eco-efficiency before and after accounting for multiple greenhouse gases. The study found that, first, before and after embedding a wide range of GHGs, China’s agricultural eco-efficiency overalltrends are basically the same, both showing slow growth in fluctuation, but the ecological impacts of non-CO 2 emissions are underestimated. Second, the agricultural eco-efficiency among China’s provinces is characterized by “high in the northwest and low in the southeast”, with spatial heterogeneity in the efficiency level. Last, the underestimation level of the balance of production and marketing area is the highest.This study proposes a novel approach by recommending the integration of various greenhouse gas emissions into the evaluation of agricultural eco-efficiency. It explores cooperative strategies for reducing emissions across several metrics. Such an approach offers quantitative insights that inform the development of green agricultural policies tailored to various regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113268
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
32.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reshaping Agriculture Eco-efficiency in China: From Greenhouse Gas Perspective

Guofeng Wang, Mengqi Zhao, Xiuli Liu, Baohui Zhao et al.
19 citations
Ecological Indicators
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
32.61
article

Reshaping Agriculture Eco-efficiency in China: From Greenhouse Gas Perspective

Guofeng Wang, Mengqi Zhao, Xiuli Liu, Baohui Zhao, Yu Wang
article en
19 citations

Abstract

• A more reasonable agricultural eco-efficiency indicator system is defined by including methane and nitrous oxide emission. • The ecological impacts of non-CO 2 emissions are underestimated. • Agricultural eco-efficiency of the northwest in China is higher than the southeast. • Quantitative insights into agricultural eco-efficiency in different regions is provided. Incorporating emissions of greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide into the metrics for agricultural eco-efficiency is critical for addressing climate change, given the significant role of agriculture in global emissions. Existing studies more focus on single carbon emission indicators and overlooks emissions of other significant greenhouse gases in measuring agricultural eco-efficiency, such as methane and nitrous oxide, leading to a potential underestimation of the true ecological impact of agricultural practices. Utilizing a dataset spanning 2000 to 2021 from China, this study for the first time includes methane and nitrous oxide in the assessment of agricultural eco-efficiency with SBM-DEA model, which defines a more standardized and accurate indicator system of agricultural eco-efficiency, and provides a more comprehensive framework for assessing the impact of agriculture on the environment. Furthermore, it rigorously assesses the variations in China’s agricultural eco-efficiency before and after accounting for multiple greenhouse gases. The study found that, first, before and after embedding a wide range of GHGs, China’s agricultural eco-efficiency overalltrends are basically the same, both showing slow growth in fluctuation, but the ecological impacts of non-CO 2 emissions are underestimated. Second, the agricultural eco-efficiency among China’s provinces is characterized by “high in the northwest and low in the southeast”, with spatial heterogeneity in the efficiency level. Last, the underestimation level of the balance of production and marketing area is the highest.This study proposes a novel approach by recommending the integration of various greenhouse gas emissions into the evaluation of agricultural eco-efficiency. It explores cooperative strategies for reducing emissions across several metrics. Such an approach offers quantitative insights that inform the development of green agricultural policies tailored to various regions.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 172
Shanxi University of Finance and Economics (CN), Beijing Technology and Business University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Technology and Business University, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
32.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.