Advancing mixed methods in mental health research
In the mental health research field, there is a need for effective and robust methodological approaches that are able to address complexity. In this article, we reassert the importance of mixed methods, an approach increasingly applied within mental health research, and examine the ongoing challenges in the field. We provide worked examples from our own research to demonstrate the diverse range of designs and benefits afforded by mixed methods approaches, along with personal reflections on barriers navigated. We outline pathways towards advancing mixed methods in mental health research, advocating for a shift from fragmentation to integration, improved publication routes for mixed methods studies and effective resourcing. To truly realise the potential of mixed methods, we call for a commitment from individual researchers, leaders, institutions, editors, funders and training providers to further these pathways.
Authors
- Ruth Plackett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-1478)
- Ola Demkowicz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9204-0912)
- Rhiannon Thompson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8188-3460)
- Eleanor Chatburn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6745-6737)
- Charlotte Archer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4762-2950)
Institutions
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Child Mind Institute (US)
- University College London (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Mental Health
- Published
- 2025-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301401
- Citations
- 9
- Primary Topic
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 25.34
Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council