Advancing mixed methods in mental health research

In the mental health research field, there is a need for effective and robust methodological approaches that are able to address complexity. In this article, we reassert the importance of mixed methods, an approach increasingly applied within mental health research, and examine the ongoing challenges in the field. We provide worked examples from our own research to demonstrate the diverse range of designs and benefits afforded by mixed methods approaches, along with personal reflections on barriers navigated. We outline pathways towards advancing mixed methods in mental health research, advocating for a shift from fragmentation to integration, improved publication routes for mixed methods studies and effective resourcing. To truly realise the potential of mixed methods, we call for a commitment from individual researchers, leaders, institutions, editors, funders and training providers to further these pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Mental Health
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301401
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing mixed methods in mental health research

Ruth Plackett, Ola Demkowicz, Rhiannon Thompson, Eleanor Chatburn et al.
9 citations
BMJ Mental Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
25.34
article

Advancing mixed methods in mental health research

Ruth Plackett, Ola Demkowicz, Rhiannon Thompson, Eleanor Chatburn, Charlotte Archer
article en
9 citations

Abstract

In the mental health research field, there is a need for effective and robust methodological approaches that are able to address complexity. In this article, we reassert the importance of mixed methods, an approach increasingly applied within mental health research, and examine the ongoing challenges in the field. We provide worked examples from our own research to demonstrate the diverse range of designs and benefits afforded by mixed methods approaches, along with personal reflections on barriers navigated. We outline pathways towards advancing mixed methods in mental health research, advocating for a shift from fragmentation to integration, improved publication routes for mixed methods studies and effective resourcing. To truly realise the potential of mixed methods, we call for a commitment from individual researchers, leaders, institutions, editors, funders and training providers to further these pathways.

BMJ Mental HealthVol. 28(1)
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Manchester (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Child Mind Institute (US), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Health Policy Implementation Science
25.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advancing mixed methods in mental health research — Ruth Plackett, Ola Demkowicz, et al. · BMJ Mental Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS