CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Multiforme

This research investigates the possibility of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in targeting glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cancer stem cells (CSCs) for increasing CSC sensitivity to conventional treatments and suppressing tumor growth. A quantitative method was used, with a sample of 36 GBM patients diagnosed and treated at major tertiary care centers in Pakistan, namely Aga Khan University Hospital (Karachi), Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital (Lahore), and Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Islamabad). Tumor tissue samples were obtained at the time of surgical resection and processed to harvest CSCs based on certain markers like CD133 and Nestin using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing was subsequently conducted on isolated CSCs to knock out genes of interest involved in stemness and therapy resistance, such as SOX2, MGMT, and Wnt/β-catenin. The efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing was evaluated by pre- and post-CRISPR tumor growth rates, proliferation assays in vitro, and neurosphere formation. Multiple regression analysis showed that CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing greatly enhanced therapy sensitivity (B = 1.427, p = 0.000), with pre-CRISPR tumor growth rate (B = -0.512, p = 0.009) and initial tumor size (B = -0.312, p = 0.040) having a negative correlation with the efficacy of treatment. Moreover, increased MGMT expression (B = -0.312, p = 0.050) was related to decreased therapy sensitivity. ANOVA test showed significant variability among the efficacies of different delivery methods for CRISPR-Cas9, including viral vectors, nanoparticles, and electroporation (F = 4.56, p = 0.008), and pointed towards optimizing the delivery strategies to achieve efficient gene editing. CRISPR-Cas9 shows promise for GBM treatment, but delivery issues and off-target effects need resolution to enable future clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.712
Citations
2
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Ahmad Zare Javid, Ammara Ali, Ali Amara, Bilal Ahmad Khan et al.
2 citations
Indus journal of bioscience research.
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
1.61
article

CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Ahmad Zare Javid, Ammara Ali, Ali Amara, Bilal Ahmad Khan, Saifullah Khan Mahar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research investigates the possibility of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in targeting glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cancer stem cells (CSCs) for increasing CSC sensitivity to conventional treatments and suppressing tumor growth. A quantitative method was used, with a sample of 36 GBM patients diagnosed and treated at major tertiary care centers in Pakistan, namely Aga Khan University Hospital (Karachi), Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital (Lahore), and Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Islamabad). Tumor tissue samples were obtained at the time of surgical resection and processed to harvest CSCs based on certain markers like CD133 and Nestin using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing was subsequently conducted on isolated CSCs to knock out genes of interest involved in stemness and therapy resistance, such as SOX2, MGMT, and Wnt/β-catenin. The efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing was evaluated by pre- and post-CRISPR tumor growth rates, proliferation assays in vitro, and neurosphere formation. Multiple regression analysis showed that CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing greatly enhanced therapy sensitivity (B = 1.427, p = 0.000), with pre-CRISPR tumor growth rate (B = -0.512, p = 0.009) and initial tumor size (B = -0.312, p = 0.040) having a negative correlation with the efficacy of treatment. Moreover, increased MGMT expression (B = -0.312, p = 0.050) was related to decreased therapy sensitivity. ANOVA test showed significant variability among the efficacies of different delivery methods for CRISPR-Cas9, including viral vectors, nanoparticles, and electroporation (F = 4.56, p = 0.008), and pointed towards optimizing the delivery strategies to achieve efficient gene editing. CRISPR-Cas9 shows promise for GBM treatment, but delivery issues and off-target effects need resolution to enable future clinical applications.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(2)
University of the Punjab (PK), Hamdard University (PK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar (PK), Gonabad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.