Occupational Therapy Assessment Practice Patterns for Core Domains in Adult Populations

Practitioners need to demonstrate the value of occupational therapy services in achieving effective patient outcomes. To intervene effectively, we must have adequate assessment practices. This study examines variation in occupational therapy assessment practices by facility type, areas addressed, and types of instruments. The study characterizes commonly and frequently used assessment practices in core occupational domains and identifies potential practice gaps related to assessment. A cross-sectional online survey across six domains central to adult occupational therapy practice (activities of daily living [ADL], instrumental activities of daily living [IADL], fear of falling, functional cognition, psychosocial, and vision) was administered to practitioners in various settings. Surveys were obtained from 1,198 respondent. Survey responses identified differences in domains being assessed and assessment methods used by occupational therapy practitioners across hospital inpatient post-acute care facilities and community settings. There is variability in the methods used to assess domains critical to occupational therapy practice and the degree to which occupational therapists evaluate domains in practice settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492251320089
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational Therapy Assessment Practice Patterns for Core Domains in Adult Populations

Julie Malloy, Debra Ouellette, Tracy M. Mroz, Gordon Muir Giles et al.
OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Occupational Therapy Assessment Practice Patterns for Core Domains in Adult Populations

Julie Malloy, Debra Ouellette, Tracy M. Mroz, Gordon Muir Giles, Trudy Mallinson, Jeremy Furniss, Pamela Roberts
article en

Abstract

Practitioners need to demonstrate the value of occupational therapy services in achieving effective patient outcomes. To intervene effectively, we must have adequate assessment practices. This study examines variation in occupational therapy assessment practices by facility type, areas addressed, and types of instruments. The study characterizes commonly and frequently used assessment practices in core occupational domains and identifies potential practice gaps related to assessment. A cross-sectional online survey across six domains central to adult occupational therapy practice (activities of daily living [ADL], instrumental activities of daily living [IADL], fear of falling, functional cognition, psychosocial, and vision) was administered to practitioners in various settings. Surveys were obtained from 1,198 respondent. Survey responses identified differences in domains being assessed and assessment methods used by occupational therapy practitioners across hospital inpatient post-acute care facilities and community settings. There is variability in the methods used to assess domains critical to occupational therapy practice and the degree to which occupational therapists evaluate domains in practice settings.

OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of ResearchVol. 46(1)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), George Washington University (US), University of Washington (US), Samuel Merritt University (US), American Occupational Therapy Association (US), Casa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.