Liberation, Ecology, and Industrialization in the Thought of Ismail-Sabri Abdallah

This article examines the work of Ismail-Sabri Abdallah in relation to two arenas of thought marginalized in the current Marxist debate: socially and ecologically “appropriate” planning and technologies, and national liberation and postcolonial planning more broadly. Abdallah was a senior official in the Egypt National Planning Institute under Gamal Abdel Nasser and then Anwar Sadat. He was also a central figure in arenas like the Third World Forum. As a theorist and practitioner, he faced the multi-scalar problems of planning in a postcolonial state. His work wove together the problematics of the appropriate technologies to use for supplying basic needs for a primarily rural or slum-dwelling population; the pressing problem of unemployment; the nascent problem of ecological degradation; the incipient problem of rapid depletion of exhaustible natural resources; and the existential problem of national defense as a component of Third World development. This article therefore reads his oeuvre as one articulation of peripheral ecological thought within the national liberation tradition, while placing it in associated debates concerning basic needs, the right to development, delinking, and the particularities of the Third World encounter with the ecological crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22779760251317271
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liberation, Ecology, and Industrialization in the Thought of Ismail-Sabri Abdallah

Max Ajl
Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Liberation, Ecology, and Industrialization in the Thought of Ismail-Sabri Abdallah

Max Ajl
article en

Abstract

This article examines the work of Ismail-Sabri Abdallah in relation to two arenas of thought marginalized in the current Marxist debate: socially and ecologically “appropriate” planning and technologies, and national liberation and postcolonial planning more broadly. Abdallah was a senior official in the Egypt National Planning Institute under Gamal Abdel Nasser and then Anwar Sadat. He was also a central figure in arenas like the Third World Forum. As a theorist and practitioner, he faced the multi-scalar problems of planning in a postcolonial state. His work wove together the problematics of the appropriate technologies to use for supplying basic needs for a primarily rural or slum-dwelling population; the pressing problem of unemployment; the nascent problem of ecological degradation; the incipient problem of rapid depletion of exhaustible natural resources; and the existential problem of national defense as a component of Third World development. This article therefore reads his oeuvre as one articulation of peripheral ecological thought within the national liberation tradition, while placing it in associated debates concerning basic needs, the right to development, delinking, and the particularities of the Third World encounter with the ecological crisis.

Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARESVol. 14(1)
Tunis University (TN), Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.