Comparative Analysis of Water-Level Forecasting Using SWMM and HEC-RAS Flood Simulation Models: A Case Study of Waryong, Jinju

Frequent flooding occurs in many rivers and urban areas, exacerbated by recent increase in localized heavy rainfall events induced by global climate change. Particularly, the area encompassing Songbaek to Waryong districts in Jinju is frequently affected by flooding due to typhoons and heavy rainfall-related outflow from the Namgang Dam, resulting in significant economic losses, though it is located in a flood plain. In this study, two flood analysis models, namely HEC-RAS and EPA-SWMM, were used to simulate the flood overflow in Waryong district. HEC-RAS is specialized in 2D analysis, and simulates topography-based inundation effects and spatial spread of water, thus making it advantageous for flood prediction in rivers or low-lying areas. In contrast, EPA-SWMM is specialized in 1D analysis, and focuses on sewer systems and conduit flows, thus rendering it suitable for urban drainage system analysis. These two models were used for simulations based on (i) a measured discharge of 792 ㎥/s from a recent flood event that caused overflow of the study area and (ii) a projected flood discharge of 3,540 ㎥/s for Waryong district. The simulations demonstrated that models a-1, a-2, b-1, and b-2 estimated flood depths of 15.25, 14.81, 19.20, and 17.11 m, respectively. A comparison of these results with the actual flood depth in Waryong District showed that HEC-RAS, which considers 2D flow and reflects detailed topographic data, yielded results closer to the actual flood depth. In contrast, EPA-SWMM, which focuses on 1D conduit flows, tended to underestimate the flood depth. In essence, this study suggested that considering the different analysis characteristics and limitations of the two models, their comparative analysis can provide a more accurate approach for flood prediction and overflow analysis. Future research should focus on combining 1D and 2D analyses or calibrating these models to enhance accuracy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2025.25.1.161
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Water-Level Forecasting Using SWMM and HEC-RAS Flood Simulation Models: A Case Study of Waryong, Jinju

Taesam Lee, Yeosang Yoon, Stephen Lee
Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Comparative Analysis of Water-Level Forecasting Using SWMM and HEC-RAS Flood Simulation Models: A Case Study of Waryong, Jinju

Taesam Lee, Yeosang Yoon, Stephen Lee
article en

Abstract

Frequent flooding occurs in many rivers and urban areas, exacerbated by recent increase in localized heavy rainfall events induced by global climate change. Particularly, the area encompassing Songbaek to Waryong districts in Jinju is frequently affected by flooding due to typhoons and heavy rainfall-related outflow from the Namgang Dam, resulting in significant economic losses, though it is located in a flood plain. In this study, two flood analysis models, namely HEC-RAS and EPA-SWMM, were used to simulate the flood overflow in Waryong district. HEC-RAS is specialized in 2D analysis, and simulates topography-based inundation effects and spatial spread of water, thus making it advantageous for flood prediction in rivers or low-lying areas. In contrast, EPA-SWMM is specialized in 1D analysis, and focuses on sewer systems and conduit flows, thus rendering it suitable for urban drainage system analysis. These two models were used for simulations based on (i) a measured discharge of 792 ㎥/s from a recent flood event that caused overflow of the study area and (ii) a projected flood discharge of 3,540 ㎥/s for Waryong district. The simulations demonstrated that models a-1, a-2, b-1, and b-2 estimated flood depths of 15.25, 14.81, 19.20, and 17.11 m, respectively. A comparison of these results with the actual flood depth in Waryong District showed that HEC-RAS, which considers 2D flow and reflects detailed topographic data, yielded results closer to the actual flood depth. In contrast, EPA-SWMM, which focuses on 1D conduit flows, tended to underestimate the flood depth. In essence, this study suggested that considering the different analysis characteristics and limitations of the two models, their comparative analysis can provide a more accurate approach for flood prediction and overflow analysis. Future research should focus on combining 1D and 2D analyses or calibrating these models to enhance accuracy.

Korean Society of Hazard MitigationVol. 25(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Water-Level Forecasting Using SWMM and HEC-RAS Flood Simulation Models: A Case Study of Waryong, Jinju — Taesam Lee, Yeosang Yoon, et al. · Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS