Comparison of Training for Hand Gesture Recognition for Synthetic and Real Datasets

Human gesture recognition is often implemented in many HRI applications. Building datasets that involve human subjects, when aiming to capture comprehensive diversity and all possible edge cases is often both challenging and labor-intensive. While applying the concept of domain randomization to build synthetic datasets helps address the problem, an innate reality gap always exists that needs to be mitigated. In this paper, We present and discuss a comprehensive performance comparison of our synth datasets with real ones and demonstrate the results in this paper.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2024.150214
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Training for Hand Gesture Recognition for Synthetic and Real Datasets

Pranav Vaidik Dhulipala, Stavros Kalafatis, Samuel Oncken, Steven Claypool
1 citations
Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
1.94
article

Comparison of Training for Hand Gesture Recognition for Synthetic and Real Datasets

Pranav Vaidik Dhulipala, Stavros Kalafatis, Samuel Oncken, Steven Claypool
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Human gesture recognition is often implemented in many HRI applications. Building datasets that involve human subjects, when aiming to capture comprehensive diversity and all possible edge cases is often both challenging and labor-intensive. While applying the concept of domain randomization to build synthetic datasets helps address the problem, an innate reality gap always exists that needs to be mitigated. In this paper, We present and discuss a comprehensive performance comparison of our synth datasets with real ones and demonstrate the results in this paper.

Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.