The Methods Used to Avoid Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Do Not Negatively Effect Pregnancy Success Rates Following In vitro Fertilization in Young Women with High Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels

Objective: To determine if two methods to avoid the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in young women undergoing in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer with high serum antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels, namely deferring fresh embryo transfer (ET) in favor of subsequent frozen ET (FET) and substituting leuprolide acetate for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to advance meiosis, negatively affects pregnancy outcome. Material and Method: Retrospective comparison of frequency of using these two techniques to avoid OHSS in women aged <35 for women with normal ovarian reserve (serum AMH 1 to <5 ng/ml) and high-responders defined as those likely to stimulate a high number of dominant follicles (20 or more) or attaining serum estradiol (E2) levels on day of trigger shot of >4000 pg/ ml based on serum AMH >5 ng/ml. Live delivered pregnancy rates (LDPRs) were determined according to the pregnancy rate per transfer and per given oocyte harvest (i.e. counting subsequent FET cycles if the first transfer did not work as long as they did not go through another oocyte retrieval). Only one live delivery per patient was included. Results: For the majority of women, there was no adverse effect on LDPR in the high AMH group when choosing leuprolide acetate to advance meiosis vs hCG. Only a minority of women used leuprolide in the normal oocyte reserve group which did not negatively affect pregnancy outcomes either. Deferring fresh ET was more common in the high AMH group than the normal group, but it had no negative impact on pregnancy outcome. Conclusion: Since there were not any patients that developed severe OHSS requiring hospitalization, physicians should not be afraid to use GNRHa vs hCG in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) as it not only helps to avoid severe OHSS, but also has no negative impact on pregnancy rates in patients undergoing IVF.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology Research
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26502/ogr0176
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Methods Used to Avoid Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Do Not Negatively Effect Pregnancy Success Rates Following In vitro Fertilization in Young Women with High Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels

J.H. Check, C. Wilson, Brooke Neumann, Donna Summers et al.
1 links
Obstetrics and Gynecology Research
Ovarian function and disorders
article

The Methods Used to Avoid Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Do Not Negatively Effect Pregnancy Success Rates Following In vitro Fertilization in Young Women with High Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels

J.H. Check, C. Wilson, Brooke Neumann, Donna Summers, Michael Sobel
article en

Abstract

Objective: To determine if two methods to avoid the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in young women undergoing in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer with high serum antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels, namely deferring fresh embryo transfer (ET) in favor of subsequent frozen ET (FET) and substituting leuprolide acetate for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to advance meiosis, negatively affects pregnancy outcome. Material and Method: Retrospective comparison of frequency of using these two techniques to avoid OHSS in women aged <35 for women with normal ovarian reserve (serum AMH 1 to <5 ng/ml) and high-responders defined as those likely to stimulate a high number of dominant follicles (20 or more) or attaining serum estradiol (E2) levels on day of trigger shot of >4000 pg/ ml based on serum AMH >5 ng/ml. Live delivered pregnancy rates (LDPRs) were determined according to the pregnancy rate per transfer and per given oocyte harvest (i.e. counting subsequent FET cycles if the first transfer did not work as long as they did not go through another oocyte retrieval). Only one live delivery per patient was included. Results: For the majority of women, there was no adverse effect on LDPR in the high AMH group when choosing leuprolide acetate to advance meiosis vs hCG. Only a minority of women used leuprolide in the normal oocyte reserve group which did not negatively affect pregnancy outcomes either. Deferring fresh ET was more common in the high AMH group than the normal group, but it had no negative impact on pregnancy outcome. Conclusion: Since there were not any patients that developed severe OHSS requiring hospitalization, physicians should not be afraid to use GNRHa vs hCG in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) as it not only helps to avoid severe OHSS, but also has no negative impact on pregnancy rates in patients undergoing IVF.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Methods Used to Avoid Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Do Not Negatively Effect Pregnancy Success Rates Following In vitro Fertilization in Young Women with High Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels — J.H. Check, C. Wilson, et al. · Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS