Safety and efficacy of cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for 1–2 level radiculopathy

Patients undergoing CF versus ACDF for 1-2 level unilateral cervical radiculopathy required 3.70 fewer postoperative X-rays, 40 min less operative time, and 10.95-h shorter lengths of hospital stay (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Alternatively, ACDF patients had a 31.3% greater probability of achieving a minimum clinically important difference in PROMIS pain interference scores but incurred a 6.25% reoperation rate, a 40% incidence of dysphagia, and high implant costs versus 0% for CF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Neurology International
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_1017_2024
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for 1–2 level radiculopathy

Paul T. Rubery, Caroline P. Thirukumaran, Gabriel Ramirez, Jefferson Hunter
Surgical Neurology International
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Safety and efficacy of cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for 1–2 level radiculopathy

Paul T. Rubery, Caroline P. Thirukumaran, Gabriel Ramirez, Jefferson Hunter
article en

Abstract

Patients undergoing CF versus ACDF for 1-2 level unilateral cervical radiculopathy required 3.70 fewer postoperative X-rays, 40 min less operative time, and 10.95-h shorter lengths of hospital stay (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Alternatively, ACDF patients had a 31.3% greater probability of achieving a minimum clinically important difference in PROMIS pain interference scores but incurred a 6.25% reoperation rate, a 40% incidence of dysphagia, and high implant costs versus 0% for CF.

Surgical Neurology InternationalVol. 16
University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.