Acute Measurement of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Comparing Two Approaches for Measuring the Alpha Angle Using the Graf Technique

Objective: The Graf method, in ultrasonography screening of developmental hip dysplasia, is based on angle measurements. Using different reference points may cause varied results. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the alpha angle obtained, varied at different reference points. Materials and Methods: There were 178 hips evaluated by two trained observers. Both measured the alpha angle with different reference points and these were labeled as methods A and B, for all the hips evaluated. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 21. Results: The average of observer 1, based on measurements with method A, were 65.63 (SD ±5.95) and based on method B were 73.39 (SD ±6.29). The average of the measurements of observer 2, utilizing method A were 64.39 (SD ±4.85) and based on method B were 69.92 (SD ±6.08). It was observed that method B showed higher mean and variability compared to method A. The agreement between observers was moderate in method A and poor in method B. The intraobserver correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.69 for method A and 0.47 for method B. The ICC was considered good (e.g., 95%) for both observers in terms of using methods A and B. Conclusion: The use of ultrasonography still maintains its place in the diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia. The Graf method is based on precise measurements, and the most decisive parameter is the alpha angle. Reference points in method A would be more useful in patient management and may increase the diagnostic accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of diagnostic medical sonography
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793251320105
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute Measurement of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Comparing Two Approaches for Measuring the Alpha Angle Using the Graf Technique

Hakan Aylanç, Duygu Sıddıkoğlu, Nilüfer Aylanç, Senay Bengın Ertem et al.
Journal of diagnostic medical sonography
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Acute Measurement of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Comparing Two Approaches for Measuring the Alpha Angle Using the Graf Technique

Hakan Aylanç, Duygu Sıddıkoğlu, Nilüfer Aylanç, Senay Bengın Ertem, Mustafa Reşorlu, Fırat Dindar
article en

Abstract

Objective: The Graf method, in ultrasonography screening of developmental hip dysplasia, is based on angle measurements. Using different reference points may cause varied results. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the alpha angle obtained, varied at different reference points. Materials and Methods: There were 178 hips evaluated by two trained observers. Both measured the alpha angle with different reference points and these were labeled as methods A and B, for all the hips evaluated. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 21. Results: The average of observer 1, based on measurements with method A, were 65.63 (SD ±5.95) and based on method B were 73.39 (SD ±6.29). The average of the measurements of observer 2, utilizing method A were 64.39 (SD ±4.85) and based on method B were 69.92 (SD ±6.08). It was observed that method B showed higher mean and variability compared to method A. The agreement between observers was moderate in method A and poor in method B. The intraobserver correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.69 for method A and 0.47 for method B. The ICC was considered good (e.g., 95%) for both observers in terms of using methods A and B. Conclusion: The use of ultrasonography still maintains its place in the diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia. The Graf method is based on precise measurements, and the most decisive parameter is the alpha angle. Reference points in method A would be more useful in patient management and may increase the diagnostic accuracy.

Journal of diagnostic medical sonographyVol. 41(4)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.