Optimizing Model Performance and Interpretability: Application to Biological Data Classification

This study introduces a novel framework that simultaneously addresses the challenges of performance accuracy and result interpretability in transcriptomic-data-based classification. <b>Background/objectives</b>: In biological data classification, it is challenging to achieve both high performance accuracy and interpretability at the same time. This study presents a framework to address both challenges in transcriptomic-data-based classification. The goal is to select features, models, and a meta-voting classifier that optimizes both classification performance and interpretability. <b>Methods</b>: The framework consists of a four-step feature selection process: (1) the identification of metabolic pathways whose enzyme-gene expressions discriminate samples with different labels, aiding interpretability; (2) the selection of pathways whose expression variance is largely captured by the first principal component of the gene expression matrix; (3) the selection of minimal sets of genes, whose collective discerning power covers 95% of the pathway-based discerning power; and (4) the introduction of adversarial samples to identify and filter genes sensitive to such samples. Additionally, adversarial samples are used to select the optimal classification model, and a meta-voting classifier is constructed based on the optimized model results. <b>Results</b>: The framework applied to two cancer classification problems showed that in the binary classification, the prediction performance was comparable to the full-gene model, with F1-score differences of between -5% and 5%. In the ternary classification, the performance was significantly better, with F1-score differences ranging from -2% to 12%, while also maintaining excellent interpretability of the selected feature genes. <b>Conclusions</b>: This framework effectively integrates feature selection, adversarial sample handling, and model optimization, offering a valuable tool for a wide range of biological data classification problems. Its ability to balance performance accuracy and high interpretability makes it highly applicable in the field of computational biology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030297
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Model Performance and Interpretability: Application to Biological Data Classification

Zhenyu Huang, Gangyi Xiao, Ying Xu, Yangkun Cao et al.
1 citations
Genes
Gene expression and cancer classification
0.81
article

Optimizing Model Performance and Interpretability: Application to Biological Data Classification

Zhenyu Huang, Gangyi Xiao, Ying Xu, Yangkun Cao, Bocheng Shi, Yan Wang, Qiufen Chen, Siyu Qiao, Xuechen Mu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study introduces a novel framework that simultaneously addresses the challenges of performance accuracy and result interpretability in transcriptomic-data-based classification. <b>Background/objectives</b>: In biological data classification, it is challenging to achieve both high performance accuracy and interpretability at the same time. This study presents a framework to address both challenges in transcriptomic-data-based classification. The goal is to select features, models, and a meta-voting classifier that optimizes both classification performance and interpretability. <b>Methods</b>: The framework consists of a four-step feature selection process: (1) the identification of metabolic pathways whose enzyme-gene expressions discriminate samples with different labels, aiding interpretability; (2) the selection of pathways whose expression variance is largely captured by the first principal component of the gene expression matrix; (3) the selection of minimal sets of genes, whose collective discerning power covers 95% of the pathway-based discerning power; and (4) the introduction of adversarial samples to identify and filter genes sensitive to such samples. Additionally, adversarial samples are used to select the optimal classification model, and a meta-voting classifier is constructed based on the optimized model results. <b>Results</b>: The framework applied to two cancer classification problems showed that in the binary classification, the prediction performance was comparable to the full-gene model, with F1-score differences of between -5% and 5%. In the ternary classification, the performance was significantly better, with F1-score differences ranging from -2% to 12%, while also maintaining excellent interpretability of the selected feature genes. <b>Conclusions</b>: This framework effectively integrates feature selection, adversarial sample handling, and model optimization, offering a valuable tool for a wide range of biological data classification problems. Its ability to balance performance accuracy and high interpretability makes it highly applicable in the field of computational biology.

GenesVol. 16(3)
Jilin University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Gene expression and cancer classification
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.