Legal Personhood of Autonomous Systems: A Jurisprudential Analysis

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems has led to extensive debates on whether these entities should be granted legal personhood. This paper explores the legal frameworks, philosophical arguments, and policy considerations surrounding the attribution of legal personhood to AI. The study examines key legislative efforts, such as the European Parliament's 2017 resolution on AI legal personhood, and assesses the ethical, economic, and regulatory implications. While some scholars advocate for an “electronic personality” model, others highlight accountability gaps and risks associated with AI autonomy. The findings suggest that AI legal personhood remains a contested concept, with prevailing legal doctrines favoring strict liability over autonomous legal recognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.293
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Personhood of Autonomous Systems: A Jurisprudential Analysis

Nodirbek Inoyatov
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Legal Personhood of Autonomous Systems: A Jurisprudential Analysis

Nodirbek Inoyatov
article en

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems has led to extensive debates on whether these entities should be granted legal personhood. This paper explores the legal frameworks, philosophical arguments, and policy considerations surrounding the attribution of legal personhood to AI. The study examines key legislative efforts, such as the European Parliament's 2017 resolution on AI legal personhood, and assesses the ethical, economic, and regulatory implications. While some scholars advocate for an “electronic personality” model, others highlight accountability gaps and risks associated with AI autonomy. The findings suggest that AI legal personhood remains a contested concept, with prevailing legal doctrines favoring strict liability over autonomous legal recognition.

Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.Vol. 3(1)
Master's College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.