Mèmes et discours misogynes, homophobes et xénophobes : quels contre-discours ?

This article examines the techno-discursive and argumentative strategies deployed in Internet memes “responding” to various instances of hate speech on social and political issues such as immigration, xenophobia, and homophobia. First, we present the object “meme” to characterize its scriptural and enunciative features and highlight its discursive and enunciative specificity. We then analyse a pilot corpus collected to explore certain dimensions of this object, aiming to understand the memetic strategies implemented by Internet users to counter hate. By detailing, in particular, the argumentative methods used to respond to xenophobic hate, we identify two original dimensions: the staging of viewpoints and their interweaving to counter hate, and the use of an anti-ethos that ridicules the bearer of hate speech.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26034/ne.tranel.2024.6993
Primary Topic
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mèmes et discours misogynes, homophobes et xénophobes : quels contre-discours ?

Julien Longhi, Francesco Attruia, Stefano Vicari
Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
article

Mèmes et discours misogynes, homophobes et xénophobes : quels contre-discours ?

Julien Longhi, Francesco Attruia, Stefano Vicari
article en

Abstract

This article examines the techno-discursive and argumentative strategies deployed in Internet memes “responding” to various instances of hate speech on social and political issues such as immigration, xenophobia, and homophobia. First, we present the object “meme” to characterize its scriptural and enunciative features and highlight its discursive and enunciative specificity. We then analyse a pilot corpus collected to explore certain dimensions of this object, aiming to understand the memetic strategies implemented by Internet users to counter hate. By detailing, in particular, the argumentative methods used to respond to xenophobic hate, we identify two original dimensions: the staging of viewpoints and their interweaving to counter hate, and the use of an anti-ethos that ridicules the bearer of hate speech.

Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistiqueVol. 80
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.