Zirconium-Containing Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as Catalysts for Biomass Conversion

In this work, we review some illustrative examples to evidence the potential of two archetypal Zr-containing MOFs, UiO-66 and MOF-808, as heterogeneous catalysts for converting biomass-derived products into valuable chemicals. The reactions are organized in three blocks, depending on the biomass source: carbohydrates, lipids, and other sources. Through this review, we will show that the chemical properties of these two Zr-MOFs are significantly different in terms of the nature and strength of acid sites, which largely depends on the number of missing linker defects of the solid and its hydration state. While hydrated UiO-66 bears relatively strong Brønsted-induced acid sites, dehydrated MOF-808 is more than competent as a Lewis acid catalyst. Therefore, we will pick one or the other catalyst depending on the particular demands of the catalytic transformation that we want to carry out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052609
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zirconium-Containing Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as Catalysts for Biomass Conversion

Anastasia Rapeyko, Francesc X. Llabrés i Xamena
7 citations
Applied Sciences
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
3.76
article

Zirconium-Containing Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as Catalysts for Biomass Conversion

Anastasia Rapeyko, Francesc X. Llabrés i Xamena
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In this work, we review some illustrative examples to evidence the potential of two archetypal Zr-containing MOFs, UiO-66 and MOF-808, as heterogeneous catalysts for converting biomass-derived products into valuable chemicals. The reactions are organized in three blocks, depending on the biomass source: carbohydrates, lipids, and other sources. Through this review, we will show that the chemical properties of these two Zr-MOFs are significantly different in terms of the nature and strength of acid sites, which largely depends on the number of missing linker defects of the solid and its hydration state. While hydrated UiO-66 bears relatively strong Brønsted-induced acid sites, dehydrated MOF-808 is more than competent as a Lewis acid catalyst. Therefore, we will pick one or the other catalyst depending on the particular demands of the catalytic transformation that we want to carry out.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(5)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Instituto de Tecnología Química (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zirconium-Containing Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as Catalysts for Biomass Conversion — Anastasia Rapeyko, Francesc X. Llabrés i Xamena · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS