Environmental impacts of decommissioning a nuclear power plant: A life cycle assessment of a Magnox site

With over 400 nuclear power reactors around the world, decommissioning will be an ongoing challenge for some decades. Countries which pioneered nuclear power, such as the UK, USA, Russia and France, are already amassing considerable experience of decommissioning end-of-life reactors. This is a complex undertaking with varied waste streams and has been simplified in previous life cycle assessments of nuclear power, with only one prior study focusing on the detail of decommissioning. The present study applies LCA to the entire decommissioning process of a UK Magnox power plant using Sphera LCA FE (formerly GaBi) with supporting data sourced from ecoinvent v3.9.1. The functional unit is ‘one decommissioned Magnox nuclear site’ and the system boundary is gate to grave, starting once the plant has been defueled and ending with a remediated site. The total climate change impact was found to be 212 kt CO 2 eq., or 3.1 g CO 2 eq./kWh. Across 19 environmental impacts, construction of disposal facilities are key hotspots (35 % ILW disposal facility, 27 % LLW disposal facility), with waste packaging accounting for 30.8 % of the total impact. Sensitivity analysis considered enhanced recycling and waste rerouting, identifying a potential climate change impact reduction of 18.9 % (40 kt CO 2 eq.) if concrete recycling rates were increased to 60 %. Steel recycling saw an overall emission reduction of 10.3 % (21.9 kt CO 2 eq.) when the savings in producing virgin steel were credited to the system via system expansion. Further research is recommended into the environmental impacts (and optimisation) of treatment processes needed to decontaminate and reuse/recycle concrete and steel in order to realise the above gains. Furthermore, greater use of LCA in general within radioactive waste treatment and disposal could lead to substantial improvements in understanding and sustainability. • Full LCA of nuclear power plant decommissioning across 19 impact categories. • Total climate change impact estimated at 212 kt CO 2 eq., equating to 3.1 g CO 2 eq./kWh. • Hotspots are disposal facilities (average 62 % of impacts) and waste packaging (30.8 %). • CO 2 eq. emissions could be reduced by < 28 % with further concrete and steel recycling. • Uncertainties remain over decontamination methods and environmental impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107880
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental impacts of decommissioning a nuclear power plant: A life cycle assessment of a Magnox site

Anthony Banford, Laurence Stamford, Joel Kirk, Rachael Clayton
10 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
5.18
article

Environmental impacts of decommissioning a nuclear power plant: A life cycle assessment of a Magnox site

Anthony Banford, Laurence Stamford, Joel Kirk, Rachael Clayton
article en
10 citations

Abstract

With over 400 nuclear power reactors around the world, decommissioning will be an ongoing challenge for some decades. Countries which pioneered nuclear power, such as the UK, USA, Russia and France, are already amassing considerable experience of decommissioning end-of-life reactors. This is a complex undertaking with varied waste streams and has been simplified in previous life cycle assessments of nuclear power, with only one prior study focusing on the detail of decommissioning. The present study applies LCA to the entire decommissioning process of a UK Magnox power plant using Sphera LCA FE (formerly GaBi) with supporting data sourced from ecoinvent v3.9.1. The functional unit is ‘one decommissioned Magnox nuclear site’ and the system boundary is gate to grave, starting once the plant has been defueled and ending with a remediated site. The total climate change impact was found to be 212 kt CO 2 eq., or 3.1 g CO 2 eq./kWh. Across 19 environmental impacts, construction of disposal facilities are key hotspots (35 % ILW disposal facility, 27 % LLW disposal facility), with waste packaging accounting for 30.8 % of the total impact. Sensitivity analysis considered enhanced recycling and waste rerouting, identifying a potential climate change impact reduction of 18.9 % (40 kt CO 2 eq.) if concrete recycling rates were increased to 60 %. Steel recycling saw an overall emission reduction of 10.3 % (21.9 kt CO 2 eq.) when the savings in producing virgin steel were credited to the system via system expansion. Further research is recommended into the environmental impacts (and optimisation) of treatment processes needed to decontaminate and reuse/recycle concrete and steel in order to realise the above gains. Furthermore, greater use of LCA in general within radioactive waste treatment and disposal could lead to substantial improvements in understanding and sustainability. • Full LCA of nuclear power plant decommissioning across 19 impact categories. • Total climate change impact estimated at 212 kt CO 2 eq., equating to 3.1 g CO 2 eq./kWh. • Hotspots are disposal facilities (average 62 % of impacts) and waste packaging (30.8 %). • CO 2 eq. emissions could be reduced by < 28 % with further concrete and steel recycling. • Uncertainties remain over decontamination methods and environmental impacts.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 113
National Nuclear Laboratory (GB), University of Manchester (GB)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Horizon 2020
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
5.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.