Analysis of formation properties and configuration impact on the oil recovery factor during the production of oil and gas condensate fields

Relevance. A significant share of oil reserves is contained in the oil rims of gas or gas condensate fields. The strategy and sequence of development of oil and gas parts of such fields largely determines the amount of oil, which will not be produced. Effective use of the chosen development strategy is impossible without considering the individual characteristics of the reservoir. Aim. Analysis of the configuration and properties of the reservoir and the technological mode of operation impact on the oil recovery factor to select the most effective development strategy using reservoir simulation. Methods. Simulation of the development of an oil and gas condensate field is carried out in the tNavigator software package of Rock Flow Dynamics based on a system of multiphase filtration equations. The parametric analysis of the influence of the depth of the oil-water contact, the type of oil rim, the development strategy, anisotropy, permeability and M-factor on the dependence of the oil recovery factor on its flow rate is carried out. Results and conclusions. As a result of simulation, it was found that the primary development of the oil rim allows achieving large oil recovery factor compared with the simultaneous development of the gas cap and the oil rim. In the case of a small distance between the surfaces of gas–oil and water–oil contacts, it is necessary to implement a strategy in which gas production begins almost simultaneously with oil production. It is established that the presence of an optimal oil flow rate is caused by increase in the pressure drop between the gas cap and the oil rim in the well area, accelerating the presence of the gas breakthrough to producers. It is shown that for edge-type oil rims, the lateral permeability value contributes more to the presence of the cone formation effect than the vertical one. In contrast, high values of the reservoir anisotropy coefficient have a negative impact on oil recovery for the underlying type of rim.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2025/2/4480
Primary Topic
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of formation properties and configuration impact on the oil recovery factor during the production of oil and gas condensate fields

Alexander P. Shevelev, Alexander Ya. Gilmanov, Vsevolod A. Kriazhev, Yaroslav A. Kriazhev
Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
article

Analysis of formation properties and configuration impact on the oil recovery factor during the production of oil and gas condensate fields

Alexander P. Shevelev, Alexander Ya. Gilmanov, Vsevolod A. Kriazhev, Yaroslav A. Kriazhev
article en

Abstract

Relevance. A significant share of oil reserves is contained in the oil rims of gas or gas condensate fields. The strategy and sequence of development of oil and gas parts of such fields largely determines the amount of oil, which will not be produced. Effective use of the chosen development strategy is impossible without considering the individual characteristics of the reservoir. Aim. Analysis of the configuration and properties of the reservoir and the technological mode of operation impact on the oil recovery factor to select the most effective development strategy using reservoir simulation. Methods. Simulation of the development of an oil and gas condensate field is carried out in the tNavigator software package of Rock Flow Dynamics based on a system of multiphase filtration equations. The parametric analysis of the influence of the depth of the oil-water contact, the type of oil rim, the development strategy, anisotropy, permeability and M-factor on the dependence of the oil recovery factor on its flow rate is carried out. Results and conclusions. As a result of simulation, it was found that the primary development of the oil rim allows achieving large oil recovery factor compared with the simultaneous development of the gas cap and the oil rim. In the case of a small distance between the surfaces of gas–oil and water–oil contacts, it is necessary to implement a strategy in which gas production begins almost simultaneously with oil production. It is established that the presence of an optimal oil flow rate is caused by increase in the pressure drop between the gas cap and the oil rim in the well area, accelerating the presence of the gas breakthrough to producers. It is shown that for edge-type oil rims, the lateral permeability value contributes more to the presence of the cone formation effect than the vertical one. In contrast, high values of the reservoir anisotropy coefficient have a negative impact on oil recovery for the underlying type of rim.

Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets EngineeringVol. 336(2)
Riau University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.