Influence of coal rank, ash, mineral content, and maceral composition on CO2 adsorption in South African coals

• Vitrinite reflectance significantly influences CO₂ adsorption in medium-rank South African coals. • Coals with comparable ash content but varying vitrinite content show minimal differences in CO₂ adsorption. • Mineral matter and the maceral component liptinite content are negatively correlated with CO₂ adsorption in all coals. • CO₂ adsorption gradually declines with an increasing vitrinite-to-inertinite ratio. This study investigated the influence of coal rank, ash content, mineral matter, and maceral composition on the CO 2 adsorption capacity of ten distinct South African coal samples. A high-pressure volumetric adsorption system (HPVAS) was utilized to assess CO 2 sorption characteristics under supercritical conditions at 35 °C and pressures up to 85 bar. Comprehensive characterization, including proximate and ultimate analysis, petrographic analysis, and density determination, was conducted to understand how these factors influence CO 2 adsorption. The findings reveal that higher-rank coals (HRC), particularly those with vitrinite reflectance above 1.2%, demonstrated superior CO 2 adsorption capacities, reaching up to 2.17 mmol/g. Medium-rank coals (MRC) with higher inertinite content showed lower adsorption capacities, with the lowest recorded at 0.78 mmol/g, except for the IN coal sample. CO 2 adsorption increased with vitrinite reflectance, particularly within the 0.51% to 0.81% range for medium-rank coals. Linear increase in CO 2 adsorption capacity was noted as carbon content increased from MRC towards HRC particularly in SM and AN coals. An increase in volatile matter content corresponded with a significant decline in CO 2 sorption capacity. Additionally, a negative correlation between ash content, mineral matter, liptinite, inertinite, and CO 2 adsorption capacity was evident, likely due to pore obstruction and reduced surface area. Liptinite-rich coals, such as BL, GN, EM, and WG, exhibited decreased adsorption capacity, with BL showing the highest liptinite content at 5.5%. The analysis indicates that while ash content influences sorption capacity, the organic matter, especially vitrinite, serve as the primary sites for gas adsorption. The findings of this study will enhance understanding of the CO₂ adsorption behaviour of South African coals supporting the funding from highly intensive CO₂ emitting industries to enable further research of carbon capture and storage (CCS) pilot projects tailored to regional coal properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clce.2025.100160
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of coal rank, ash, mineral content, and maceral composition on CO2 adsorption in South African coals

Kasturie Premlall, Lawrence Koech
5 citations
Cleaner Chemical Engineering
Coal Properties and Utilization
5.73
article

Influence of coal rank, ash, mineral content, and maceral composition on CO2 adsorption in South African coals

Kasturie Premlall, Lawrence Koech
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Vitrinite reflectance significantly influences CO₂ adsorption in medium-rank South African coals. • Coals with comparable ash content but varying vitrinite content show minimal differences in CO₂ adsorption. • Mineral matter and the maceral component liptinite content are negatively correlated with CO₂ adsorption in all coals. • CO₂ adsorption gradually declines with an increasing vitrinite-to-inertinite ratio. This study investigated the influence of coal rank, ash content, mineral matter, and maceral composition on the CO 2 adsorption capacity of ten distinct South African coal samples. A high-pressure volumetric adsorption system (HPVAS) was utilized to assess CO 2 sorption characteristics under supercritical conditions at 35 °C and pressures up to 85 bar. Comprehensive characterization, including proximate and ultimate analysis, petrographic analysis, and density determination, was conducted to understand how these factors influence CO 2 adsorption. The findings reveal that higher-rank coals (HRC), particularly those with vitrinite reflectance above 1.2%, demonstrated superior CO 2 adsorption capacities, reaching up to 2.17 mmol/g. Medium-rank coals (MRC) with higher inertinite content showed lower adsorption capacities, with the lowest recorded at 0.78 mmol/g, except for the IN coal sample. CO 2 adsorption increased with vitrinite reflectance, particularly within the 0.51% to 0.81% range for medium-rank coals. Linear increase in CO 2 adsorption capacity was noted as carbon content increased from MRC towards HRC particularly in SM and AN coals. An increase in volatile matter content corresponded with a significant decline in CO 2 sorption capacity. Additionally, a negative correlation between ash content, mineral matter, liptinite, inertinite, and CO 2 adsorption capacity was evident, likely due to pore obstruction and reduced surface area. Liptinite-rich coals, such as BL, GN, EM, and WG, exhibited decreased adsorption capacity, with BL showing the highest liptinite content at 5.5%. The analysis indicates that while ash content influences sorption capacity, the organic matter, especially vitrinite, serve as the primary sites for gas adsorption. The findings of this study will enhance understanding of the CO₂ adsorption behaviour of South African coals supporting the funding from highly intensive CO₂ emitting industries to enable further research of carbon capture and storage (CCS) pilot projects tailored to regional coal properties.

Cleaner Chemical EngineeringVol. 11
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation Singapore
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Coal Properties and Utilization
5.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.