Multiunionism, Union Bureaucracy, and Untruth in Collective Ethical Self-Making

Like many Global South unions, the Mineworkers’ Union of Zambia has fragmented into multiple near-identical organizations. These unions rarely strike, and they are incentivized to cooperate with management and to compete for members by serving as financial patrons. Zambian union leaders increasingly find themselves responding to this disempowerment through omission, obfuscation, and self-deception. Rather than dismissing their actions as corruption, this article considers how untruth shapes the personal and collective political projects of union members, bureaucrats, and leaders. Linking the anthropologies of unionism and bureaucracy, this paper explores how members and bureaucrats cocreate “public” and “populist” secrecies, which protect unionism’s utopian goals and narratives of strength from practices shaped by disempowerment. Responding to works that foreground the importance of reflection in the creation of collective ethical subjects, I assert the significance of (self-)deception in responding to the constant setbacks and unequal rewards of progressive social change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Anthropology
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734797
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiunionism, Union Bureaucracy, and Untruth in Collective Ethical Self-Making

Thomas McNamara
Current Anthropology
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Multiunionism, Union Bureaucracy, and Untruth in Collective Ethical Self-Making

Thomas McNamara
article en

Abstract

Like many Global South unions, the Mineworkers’ Union of Zambia has fragmented into multiple near-identical organizations. These unions rarely strike, and they are incentivized to cooperate with management and to compete for members by serving as financial patrons. Zambian union leaders increasingly find themselves responding to this disempowerment through omission, obfuscation, and self-deception. Rather than dismissing their actions as corruption, this article considers how untruth shapes the personal and collective political projects of union members, bureaucrats, and leaders. Linking the anthropologies of unionism and bureaucracy, this paper explores how members and bureaucrats cocreate “public” and “populist” secrecies, which protect unionism’s utopian goals and narratives of strength from practices shaped by disempowerment. Responding to works that foreground the importance of reflection in the creation of collective ethical subjects, I assert the significance of (self-)deception in responding to the constant setbacks and unequal rewards of progressive social change.

Current Anthropology
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multiunionism, Union Bureaucracy, and Untruth in Collective Ethical Self-Making — Thomas McNamara · Current Anthropology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS