Relational egalitarianism, future generations, and arguments from overlap

Relational egalitarianism holds that people should live together as equals. We argue against the received wisdom amongst both friends and foes of relational egalitarianism that it fails to provide a theory of intergenerational justice. Instead, we argue that relational egalitarianism is concerned with social equality amongst future contemporaries, and that this commitment gives rise to duties of justice for current generations that can be grounded in the idea of generational overlap. In doing so, we argue that that the scope of relational egalitarian concerns extends beyond generations amongst whom social relations exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2025.2462362
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relational egalitarianism, future generations, and arguments from overlap

Dick Timmer, Tim Meijers
1 citations
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Political Philosophy and Ethics
8.52
article

Relational egalitarianism, future generations, and arguments from overlap

Dick Timmer, Tim Meijers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Relational egalitarianism holds that people should live together as equals. We argue against the received wisdom amongst both friends and foes of relational egalitarianism that it fails to provide a theory of intergenerational justice. Instead, we argue that relational egalitarianism is concerned with social equality amongst future contemporaries, and that this commitment gives rise to duties of justice for current generations that can be grounded in the idea of generational overlap. In doing so, we argue that that the scope of relational egalitarian concerns extends beyond generations amongst whom social relations exist.

Critical Review of International Social and Political PhilosophyVol. 28(3)
Leiden University (NL), TU Dortmund University (DE)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.