Analyzing the Effect of the Near-Surface Inhomogeneity on Three-Dimensional Resistivity Models

The impact of Near-Surface Inhomogeneity (NSI) on three-dimenssional (3D) resistivity data has been investigated using four electrode arrays. These arrays are Dipole-Dipole, Pole-Dipole, Pole-Pole, and Wenner arrays. Two 3D numerical models were designed by an 11m x 11m survey grid with 1m electrode spacing, featuring a low-resistivity main target and two NSI features with high resistivity of 100Ωm and low resistivity of 10Ωm, respectively. The results indicate that all arrays can detect the NSI features with enhanced performance when the low-resistivity NSI feature is presented. The high-resistivity NSI feature creates a saw-tooth form, while the low-resistivity NSI feature generates anomalous features. The Dipole-Dipole array demonstrates superior performance in delineating both NSI features, accurately detecting its lower boundary, and approximating resistivity. Pole-Dipole shows good boundary detection but with a slightly lower resolution. Pole-Pole and Wenner arrays exhibit the lowest resolution. They are overestimating the lower boundary of both NSI features. All arrays display artifacts due to the NSI effect, except for Pole-Pole, whose too-thick depth slice prevents that. For the primary target detection, Pole-Dipole and Dipole-Dipole arrays perform best resolution, allowing to delineate it at approximately the exact depth and form with resistivity values very close to the actual resistivity of the primary target. In terms of misfit errors, Dipole-Dipole and Pole-Dipole arrays offer superior resolution and performance despite their relatively high misfit errors. This analysis provides insights for selecting appropriate arrays in complex near-surface conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iraqi Geological Journal
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.58.1b.11ms-2025-2-19
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the Effect of the Near-Surface Inhomogeneity on Three-Dimensional Resistivity Models

Ahmed S. Al-Zubedi, Mohammed Al-Hameedawie
3 links
Iraqi Geological Journal
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Analyzing the Effect of the Near-Surface Inhomogeneity on Three-Dimensional Resistivity Models

Ahmed S. Al-Zubedi, Mohammed Al-Hameedawie
article en

Abstract

The impact of Near-Surface Inhomogeneity (NSI) on three-dimenssional (3D) resistivity data has been investigated using four electrode arrays. These arrays are Dipole-Dipole, Pole-Dipole, Pole-Pole, and Wenner arrays. Two 3D numerical models were designed by an 11m x 11m survey grid with 1m electrode spacing, featuring a low-resistivity main target and two NSI features with high resistivity of 100Ωm and low resistivity of 10Ωm, respectively. The results indicate that all arrays can detect the NSI features with enhanced performance when the low-resistivity NSI feature is presented. The high-resistivity NSI feature creates a saw-tooth form, while the low-resistivity NSI feature generates anomalous features. The Dipole-Dipole array demonstrates superior performance in delineating both NSI features, accurately detecting its lower boundary, and approximating resistivity. Pole-Dipole shows good boundary detection but with a slightly lower resolution. Pole-Pole and Wenner arrays exhibit the lowest resolution. They are overestimating the lower boundary of both NSI features. All arrays display artifacts due to the NSI effect, except for Pole-Pole, whose too-thick depth slice prevents that. For the primary target detection, Pole-Dipole and Dipole-Dipole arrays perform best resolution, allowing to delineate it at approximately the exact depth and form with resistivity values very close to the actual resistivity of the primary target. In terms of misfit errors, Dipole-Dipole and Pole-Dipole arrays offer superior resolution and performance despite their relatively high misfit errors. This analysis provides insights for selecting appropriate arrays in complex near-surface conditions.

Iraqi Geological JournalVol. 58(1B)
Alsalam University College (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.