Validation of High Aims 65 Score in Patients  with Variceal Bleed

Objective: To validate high AIMS 65 score for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with variceal bleed presenting to a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital Karachi, Pakistan from Aug 2021 to Apr 2022. Methodology: Cirrhotic patients having variceal bleeding requiring hospital admission, aged 18-60 years of either gender, with history of hematemesis and/or melena were assessed clinically and enrolled into the study after taking consent. All the patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the endoscopy suite. Laboratory investigations were done upon their hospital admission to figure out the AIMS 65 score. Patients’ demographic and clinical details were documented in a pre-designed proforma by the assigned data collectors. Results: 267 patients were enrolled with median age of 57(interquartile range=50-63) Median CLD duration of 48 months (IQR=36-60). There was a predominance of male patients (67.4%). Majority of the patients had AIMS score of 2(56.2%) whereas 43.8% had score of 3.30 days whereas mortality was observed in 19.1% of the cases. The frequency of mortality was significantly higher in patients having AIMS score of 3 as compared to AIMS score of 2 (70.1% versus 29.9%, p<0.001). Area under the curve of AIMS65 score was 65% (95% CI: 0.57-0.74, p=0.010). Conclusion: The study shows a rise in mortality with increasing score of AIMS65. However, AIMS65 was not found to be accurate tool for predicting mortality in cases of variceal bleeding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i1.10110
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of High Aims 65 Score in Patients  with Variceal Bleed

Muhammad Mansoor ul Haq, Ahmed Saeed, Adeel Rahat
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Validation of High Aims 65 Score in Patients  with Variceal Bleed

Muhammad Mansoor ul Haq, Ahmed Saeed, Adeel Rahat
article en

Abstract

Objective: To validate high AIMS 65 score for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with variceal bleed presenting to a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital Karachi, Pakistan from Aug 2021 to Apr 2022. Methodology: Cirrhotic patients having variceal bleeding requiring hospital admission, aged 18-60 years of either gender, with history of hematemesis and/or melena were assessed clinically and enrolled into the study after taking consent. All the patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the endoscopy suite. Laboratory investigations were done upon their hospital admission to figure out the AIMS 65 score. Patients’ demographic and clinical details were documented in a pre-designed proforma by the assigned data collectors. Results: 267 patients were enrolled with median age of 57(interquartile range=50-63) Median CLD duration of 48 months (IQR=36-60). There was a predominance of male patients (67.4%). Majority of the patients had AIMS score of 2(56.2%) whereas 43.8% had score of 3.30 days whereas mortality was observed in 19.1% of the cases. The frequency of mortality was significantly higher in patients having AIMS score of 3 as compared to AIMS score of 2 (70.1% versus 29.9%, p<0.001). Area under the curve of AIMS65 score was 65% (95% CI: 0.57-0.74, p=0.010). Conclusion: The study shows a rise in mortality with increasing score of AIMS65. However, AIMS65 was not found to be accurate tool for predicting mortality in cases of variceal bleeding.

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical JournalVol. 75(1)
Liaquat National Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.