Exploring futures for the science of global risk

Recent years have seen the emergence of a dedicated community working to understand and mitigate the risk of global disasters (global risk). This community faces an uncertain future with key challenges emerging from the diversification of perspectives and theories of change within it and the growing frequency and intensity of global crises. This paper presents a collaborative exercise exploring divergent futures for the field using a participatory narrative futures method, ParEvo. It considered near-term possibilities for global risk and how this community might respond to it. We begin by setting out the nature of the global risk community and the background to this exercise. Next, we present the method used, the participants involved, how they collaboratively constructed narrative futures, and the evaluation and textual analysis by which these were interpreted. We briefly present key results, including summaries of the completed narratives and their evaluation by participants and focused analysis of three core themes: conflict and rapprochement, agents of change, and outcomes and impacts. Finally, we discuss the exercise’s limitations and challenges and present lessons for both the application of ParEvo and similar futures tools (including using participatory exercise design and improved evaluation of contributions) and the global risk community (including the need for conflict resolution, planning for how researchers interact with actual global risk, and reflection on what the community aims to achieve). Full results from the exercise are presented in supplementary material and all the contributions made by participants can be found at https://parevo.org/exercise/exploring-futures-for-a-science-of-global-risk . • Addresses challenges facing the global risk community from its diversification a and the intensification of global crises. • Develops and applies Parevo, a participatory tool for stakeholders to collaboratively construct and evaluate futures. • The resulting futures explore a range of possibilities for global risk and how this community might respond. • Identifies lessons for participatory foresight in exercise design, facilitator interventions, and post exercise discussions. • Identifies lessons for the global risk community in living with conflict, setting goals, and the impacts of global risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futures
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103569
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring futures for the science of global risk

Luke Kemp, Julius Weitzdörfer, Lalitha Sundaram, Goodwin Gibbins et al.
Futures
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
article

Exploring futures for the science of global risk

Luke Kemp, Julius Weitzdörfer, Lalitha Sundaram, Goodwin Gibbins, Ida Josefiina, Paul Ingram, B. Holt, Rick Davies, N. Cooke, SJ Beard, Georgiana Gilgallon, Michael Cassidy, Sarah Dryhurst, Aaron Tang
article en

Abstract

Recent years have seen the emergence of a dedicated community working to understand and mitigate the risk of global disasters (global risk). This community faces an uncertain future with key challenges emerging from the diversification of perspectives and theories of change within it and the growing frequency and intensity of global crises. This paper presents a collaborative exercise exploring divergent futures for the field using a participatory narrative futures method, ParEvo. It considered near-term possibilities for global risk and how this community might respond to it. We begin by setting out the nature of the global risk community and the background to this exercise. Next, we present the method used, the participants involved, how they collaboratively constructed narrative futures, and the evaluation and textual analysis by which these were interpreted. We briefly present key results, including summaries of the completed narratives and their evaluation by participants and focused analysis of three core themes: conflict and rapprochement, agents of change, and outcomes and impacts. Finally, we discuss the exercise’s limitations and challenges and present lessons for both the application of ParEvo and similar futures tools (including using participatory exercise design and improved evaluation of contributions) and the global risk community (including the need for conflict resolution, planning for how researchers interact with actual global risk, and reflection on what the community aims to achieve). Full results from the exercise are presented in supplementary material and all the contributions made by participants can be found at https://parevo.org/exercise/exploring-futures-for-a-science-of-global-risk . • Addresses challenges facing the global risk community from its diversification a and the intensification of global crises. • Develops and applies Parevo, a participatory tool for stakeholders to collaboratively construct and evaluate futures. • The resulting futures explore a range of possibilities for global risk and how this community might respond. • Identifies lessons for participatory foresight in exercise design, facilitator interventions, and post exercise discussions. • Identifies lessons for the global risk community in living with conflict, setting goals, and the impacts of global risk.

FuturesVol. 168
Australian National University (AU), FernUniversität in Hagen (DE), SANE Mental Health Charity (GB), Parsons (United States) (US), International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (CH), Universities UK (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), The Football Association (GB), Film Independent (US), Department of Chemistry and Earth Sciences (BY), Systemic Risk Centre (GB), University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.