Effects of soil pH on growth, early fruiting and mineral nutrient profile of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple trees grafted on eight rootstocks

• Soil pH levels and rootstock genotype affect nutrient profile of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple trees. • Fruit size, bitter pit, soluble solids are all affected by pH and rootstocks. • Soil pH and rootstock choice can have large economic impact on orchard productivity. Soil pH affects apple tree growth and fruit quality due to its effects on nutrient uptake. In this study, eight apple rootstocks (Geneva® G.11, G.41, G.935, G.202, G.214, Malling (M) M.9T337, M.26EMLA, and Budagovsky (B.9) grafted with ‘Honeycrisp’ apple cultivar were grown in 55 L pots with the soil pH adjusted to 5.0, 6.5 and 8.0. at Ithaca NY for two growing seasons from 2017 to 2018. Soil pH had a significant effect on tree growth with the best growth at the highest pH. Soil pH affected fruit peel nutrient concentrations of P, Ca, Mg, Fe, S, B, and Zn. Leaf nutrients concentrations were also affected by soil pH with low pH resulting in higher values of K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe and Mn and higher soil pH resulting in higher values for P and Zn. Fruit quality indices including total soluble solids, fruit's firmness and bitter-pit incidence measured after 5 months of storage were unaffected by soil pH. However, greater fruit size was found at higher pH. Among rootstocks, G.935 had the greatest TCSA increase whereas B.9 had the smallest TCSA increase. The highest fruit number per tree in the second season was with G.41 and the lowest bitter pit % was with G.935. G.11 had the largest fruit size while G.935 had the best fruit red skin color. There were no significant interactions between rootstock genotype and soil pH on tree growth but there were several significant interactions of soil pH and rootstock genotype on leaf mineral concentrations and fruit quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Horticulturae
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114029
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of soil pH on growth, early fruiting and mineral nutrient profile of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple trees grafted on eight rootstocks

Lailiang Cheng, Gennaro Fazio, Ali Al Farqani, Terence L. Robinson
5 citations
Scientia Horticulturae
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
8.75
article

Effects of soil pH on growth, early fruiting and mineral nutrient profile of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple trees grafted on eight rootstocks

Lailiang Cheng, Gennaro Fazio, Ali Al Farqani, Terence L. Robinson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Soil pH levels and rootstock genotype affect nutrient profile of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple trees. • Fruit size, bitter pit, soluble solids are all affected by pH and rootstocks. • Soil pH and rootstock choice can have large economic impact on orchard productivity. Soil pH affects apple tree growth and fruit quality due to its effects on nutrient uptake. In this study, eight apple rootstocks (Geneva® G.11, G.41, G.935, G.202, G.214, Malling (M) M.9T337, M.26EMLA, and Budagovsky (B.9) grafted with ‘Honeycrisp’ apple cultivar were grown in 55 L pots with the soil pH adjusted to 5.0, 6.5 and 8.0. at Ithaca NY for two growing seasons from 2017 to 2018. Soil pH had a significant effect on tree growth with the best growth at the highest pH. Soil pH affected fruit peel nutrient concentrations of P, Ca, Mg, Fe, S, B, and Zn. Leaf nutrients concentrations were also affected by soil pH with low pH resulting in higher values of K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe and Mn and higher soil pH resulting in higher values for P and Zn. Fruit quality indices including total soluble solids, fruit's firmness and bitter-pit incidence measured after 5 months of storage were unaffected by soil pH. However, greater fruit size was found at higher pH. Among rootstocks, G.935 had the greatest TCSA increase whereas B.9 had the smallest TCSA increase. The highest fruit number per tree in the second season was with G.41 and the lowest bitter pit % was with G.935. G.11 had the largest fruit size while G.935 had the best fruit red skin color. There were no significant interactions between rootstock genotype and soil pH on tree growth but there were several significant interactions of soil pH and rootstock genotype on leaf mineral concentrations and fruit quality.

Scientia HorticulturaeVol. 342
Cornell University (US), New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
8.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.