Biofilm Formation by Chicken Meat Microbiota and Salmonella enterica in the Presence of Skin, Raw Meat, and Grilled Chicken Meat Residues

Biofilm formation by Salmonella enterica has been extensively studied; however, in the environment, most biofilms consist of a variety of different bacterial species. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the in vitro biofilm formation by nine S. enterica strains both individually and in mixed cultures with chicken meat microbiota (CMM) under different storage conditions using various chicken extracts. For the individual S. enterica strains and mixed cultures, a total of 54 treatments were examined. Each sample were introduced to different types of chicken extracts (from chicken skin, raw meat, and grilled meat, each with or without CMM) across three different temperature conditions (9, 14, and 25°C) and over different times (either 24, 48, and 72 h, or 5, 10, and 15 days). Biofilm formation was assessed using the method described by O’Toole, which involves staining the biofilm with crystal violet, dissolving the attached dye with acetic acid, and measuring the optical density. This quantification allows for the classification of biofilm formation as non-, weak, moderate, or strong biofilm producers. In general, in the absence of CMM, most strains (70.4%) did not form biofilms at 9°C, whereas weak biofilm production was observed at 14 and 25°C for 42.0 and 46.9% of the strains, respectively. In the presence of CMM, most treatments were classified as strong biofilm producers (79.4%). Interestingly, some mixed cultures exhibited lower biofilm formation compared to CMM alone, suggesting a potential for competitive interactions between them. These results underscore the importance of creating more realistic scenarios to simulate biofilm formation in chicken production and preparation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s002626172460650x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biofilm Formation by Chicken Meat Microbiota and Salmonella enterica in the Presence of Skin, Raw Meat, and Grilled Chicken Meat Residues

Sofía M. Arvizu‐Medrano, Montserrat Hernández‐Iturriaga, Angélica Godínez‐Oviedo, José Eduardo Lucero‐Mejía et al.
1 citations
Microbiology
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
0.81
article

Biofilm Formation by Chicken Meat Microbiota and Salmonella enterica in the Presence of Skin, Raw Meat, and Grilled Chicken Meat Residues

Sofía M. Arvizu‐Medrano, Montserrat Hernández‐Iturriaga, Angélica Godínez‐Oviedo, José Eduardo Lucero‐Mejía, C. A. Pegueros-Valencia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Biofilm formation by Salmonella enterica has been extensively studied; however, in the environment, most biofilms consist of a variety of different bacterial species. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the in vitro biofilm formation by nine S. enterica strains both individually and in mixed cultures with chicken meat microbiota (CMM) under different storage conditions using various chicken extracts. For the individual S. enterica strains and mixed cultures, a total of 54 treatments were examined. Each sample were introduced to different types of chicken extracts (from chicken skin, raw meat, and grilled meat, each with or without CMM) across three different temperature conditions (9, 14, and 25°C) and over different times (either 24, 48, and 72 h, or 5, 10, and 15 days). Biofilm formation was assessed using the method described by O’Toole, which involves staining the biofilm with crystal violet, dissolving the attached dye with acetic acid, and measuring the optical density. This quantification allows for the classification of biofilm formation as non-, weak, moderate, or strong biofilm producers. In general, in the absence of CMM, most strains (70.4%) did not form biofilms at 9°C, whereas weak biofilm production was observed at 14 and 25°C for 42.0 and 46.9% of the strains, respectively. In the presence of CMM, most treatments were classified as strong biofilm producers (79.4%). Interestingly, some mixed cultures exhibited lower biofilm formation compared to CMM alone, suggesting a potential for competitive interactions between them. These results underscore the importance of creating more realistic scenarios to simulate biofilm formation in chicken production and preparation.

MicrobiologyVol. 94(1)
Autonomous University of Queretaro (MX)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.