Identifying Rural Hotspots for Head and Neck Cancer Using the Bayesian Mapping Approach

<b>Background</b>: The Bayesian mapping approach has not been used to identify head and neck cancer hotspots in Australia previously. This study aims to identify rural communities at risk of head and neck cancer (HNC) for targeted prevention programs. <b>Methods</b>: This study included data from 23,853 cases recorded in the Queensland Cancer Register between 1982 and 2018. Outcomes for mapping included incidence, overall mortality, 3-year mortality, and 5-year mortality. Local government areas (LGAs) with a general population aged 15 years and above (according to 2016 census data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics) were utilized for mapping. <b>Results</b>: Of the 59 LGAs with higher-than-average risk, 22 predominantly rural and remote LGAs showed statistically significant higher risks of head and neck cancer occurrence. Estimated median standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) ranged from 0.57 to 3.44 and were higher than the state average in 38 LGAs. Four LGAs had the highest mortality-the Shires of Quilpie, Yarrabah, Murweh, and Hinchinbrook. <b>Conclusions</b>: Whilst reasons for some LGAs exhibiting higher HNC are unknown, Bayesian mapping highlights these rural and remote regions as worthy of further investigation. In conclusion, the Bayesian disease mapping approach is effective in identifying high-risk communities for HNC. Findings from this study will aid in designing targeted screening and interventions for the prevention and management of head and neck cancer in regional and remote communities through support services such as a cancer navigator.