Enacting embryos: Practices, ontologies, and politics of the IVF lab post‐<i>Dobbs</i>

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn the federal right to abortion, much public and political debate has surrounded gestating and in vitro embryos' "personhood." In this paper, I draw on 15 months of participant observation in biomedical spaces of infertility to reveal how embryos can be enacted as not only unborn children but as many different kinds of entities. I examine how embryos become "multiple" as in vitro fertilization (IVF) professionals inseminate, monitor, and transfer them into patients' bodies: enacting them as makeable, contingent, recordable, animatable, predictable, introducible, praisable, and appraisable entities. Providing a new perspective into the varied ontologies of in vitro embryos, this paper has far-reaching implications for the anthropological study and politics of reproductive medicine and politics today.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Anthropology Quarterly
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12916
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enacting embryos: Practices, ontologies, and politics of the IVF lab post‐Dobbs

Manon Lefevre
1 citations
Medical Anthropology Quarterly
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
article

Enacting embryos: Practices, ontologies, and politics of the IVF lab post‐Dobbs

Manon Lefevre
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn the federal right to abortion, much public and political debate has surrounded gestating and in vitro embryos' "personhood." In this paper, I draw on 15 months of participant observation in biomedical spaces of infertility to reveal how embryos can be enacted as not only unborn children but as many different kinds of entities. I examine how embryos become "multiple" as in vitro fertilization (IVF) professionals inseminate, monitor, and transfer them into patients' bodies: enacting them as makeable, contingent, recordable, animatable, predictable, introducible, praisable, and appraisable entities. Providing a new perspective into the varied ontologies of in vitro embryos, this paper has far-reaching implications for the anthropological study and politics of reproductive medicine and politics today.

Medical Anthropology QuarterlyVol. 39(3)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.