An Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc., Diagnostic Classification Among Spanish Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The NANDA International, Inc., (NANDA-I) diagnostic classification is the most widely used standardized nursing language internationally. The EVALUAN-I tool was developed to evaluate the NANDA-I diagnostic classification. The aim was to analyze the use of the NANDA-I diagnostic classification among Spanish nurses and assess its correlation with sociodemographic characteristics. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish nurses working in clinical, management, and academic settings using the EVALUAN-I tool (September 2019-December 2020). The analysis was conducted using R<sup>®</sup> (version 3.6.3, Lavaan package; R Core Team, 2020), with statistical significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2019-190-1). <b>Results:</b> A total of 483 responses were obtained. There was a correlation between the intensity of use of NANDA-I and its application in practice (polychoric correlation = 0.50; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Nurses with a PhD degree considered nursing diagnoses to be less evidence-based (<i>p</i> = 0.037) but more useful (<i>p</i> = 0.035). Academic and research nurses stated that NANDA-I was more useful (<i>p</i> = 0.007), even for exclusive responsibilities (<i>p</i> = 0.034), and that it provided greater significance to diagnoses (<i>p</i> = 0.0012). <b>Conclusions:</b> NANDA-I is the most widely used standardized nursing language in Spain. Nurses' academic qualifications and work environment significantly influence their perceptions and use of NANDA-I. Advanced education fosters a critical yet positive perspective, highlighting a relationship between the intensity of its use, its application in clinical practice, and the nurse's educational background. Tools such as EVALUAN-I promote its integration and evidence-based practice, but challenges remain in improving perceptions, scientific evidence, and visibility in electronic health records to enhance its clinical impact and nursing recognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15030079
Primary Topic
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc., Diagnostic Classification Among Spanish Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study

Rafaela Camacho‐Bejarano, Claudio-Alberto Rodríguez-Suárez, Emília Costa, María Isabel Mariscal Crespo et al.
Nursing Reports
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
article

An Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc., Diagnostic Classification Among Spanish Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study

Rafaela Camacho‐Bejarano, Claudio-Alberto Rodríguez-Suárez, Emília Costa, María Isabel Mariscal Crespo, María-Naira Hernández-De Luis, Héctor González‐de la Torre
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The NANDA International, Inc., (NANDA-I) diagnostic classification is the most widely used standardized nursing language internationally. The EVALUAN-I tool was developed to evaluate the NANDA-I diagnostic classification. The aim was to analyze the use of the NANDA-I diagnostic classification among Spanish nurses and assess its correlation with sociodemographic characteristics. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish nurses working in clinical, management, and academic settings using the EVALUAN-I tool (September 2019-December 2020). The analysis was conducted using R<sup>®</sup> (version 3.6.3, Lavaan package; R Core Team, 2020), with statistical significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2019-190-1). <b>Results:</b> A total of 483 responses were obtained. There was a correlation between the intensity of use of NANDA-I and its application in practice (polychoric correlation = 0.50; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Nurses with a PhD degree considered nursing diagnoses to be less evidence-based (<i>p</i> = 0.037) but more useful (<i>p</i> = 0.035). Academic and research nurses stated that NANDA-I was more useful (<i>p</i> = 0.007), even for exclusive responsibilities (<i>p</i> = 0.034), and that it provided greater significance to diagnoses (<i>p</i> = 0.0012). <b>Conclusions:</b> NANDA-I is the most widely used standardized nursing language in Spain. Nurses' academic qualifications and work environment significantly influence their perceptions and use of NANDA-I. Advanced education fosters a critical yet positive perspective, highlighting a relationship between the intensity of its use, its application in clinical practice, and the nurse's educational background. Tools such as EVALUAN-I promote its integration and evidence-based practice, but challenges remain in improving perceptions, scientific evidence, and visibility in electronic health records to enhance its clinical impact and nursing recognition.

Nursing ReportsVol. 15(3)
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES), Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria (ES), Primary Health Care (QA), Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (PT), University of Algarve (PT), Universidad de Huelva (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.