Cost sharing methodologies for remedial actions in cross-border cooperation between electricity transmission system operators

The implementation of a methodology for the cost allocation of remedial actions is a necessity for the cooperation of European Transmission System Operators (TSOs). In this study, we adhere to the entirety of the methodology for cross-border congestion management cost sharing developed for the CORE Capacity Calculation Region (CCR) and focus on the variety of power flow decomposition methods that could be used, potentially leading to quantitative differences in the final allocation of congestion management costs. We analyse results from simulating the application of these decomposition methods over a set of test cases based on IEEE benchmarks. Our findings underline the major role of loop flows and reveal that the final cost-sharing outcome is relatively insensitive to the choice of a particular flow decomposition approach. Given that there is no unique answer to the power flow decomposition question, this adds confidence to the cost allocation process envisioned for Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.4657
Primary Topic
Power Systems and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost sharing methodologies for remedial actions in cross-border cooperation between electricity transmission system operators

Anthony Papavasiliou, Efthymios Karangelos, Ilias Stavropoulos
IET conference proceedings.
Power Systems and Technologies
article

Cost sharing methodologies for remedial actions in cross-border cooperation between electricity transmission system operators

Anthony Papavasiliou, Efthymios Karangelos, Ilias Stavropoulos
article en

Abstract

The implementation of a methodology for the cost allocation of remedial actions is a necessity for the cooperation of European Transmission System Operators (TSOs). In this study, we adhere to the entirety of the methodology for cross-border congestion management cost sharing developed for the CORE Capacity Calculation Region (CCR) and focus on the variety of power flow decomposition methods that could be used, potentially leading to quantitative differences in the final allocation of congestion management costs. We analyse results from simulating the application of these decomposition methods over a set of test cases based on IEEE benchmarks. Our findings underline the major role of loop flows and reveal that the final cost-sharing outcome is relatively insensitive to the choice of a particular flow decomposition approach. Given that there is no unique answer to the power flow decomposition question, this adds confidence to the cost allocation process envisioned for Europe.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2024(29)
University of Liège (BE), National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Power Systems and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost sharing methodologies for remedial actions in cross-border cooperation between electricity transmission system operators — Anthony Papavasiliou, Efthymios Karangelos, et al. · IET conference proceedings. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS