Implementation of Deep Learning Techniques for Deepfake Classification: A comparative study using ResNet-50 and VGG16

This work investigates the use and assessment of ResNet-50 and VGG16 deep learning models for detecting deepfake images using the Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW) dataset. The methodology encompassed thorough preparation of the dataset and the utilisation of both models to differentiate between authentic and altered facial photos. The models' performance was evaluated using fundamental criteria including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. VGG16 demonstrated superior performance compared to ResNet-50, achieving an accuracy of 93.87%, recall of 96.23%, and an F1 score of 94.41%, while ResNet-50 achieved a precision of 92.54%, recall of 95.26%, and F1 score of 93.88%. Although both models achieved good accuracy, VGG16 had superior stability and generalization across the whole dataset. The study determines that VGG16 is the more dependable model for detecting deepfakes on the LFW dataset. It suggests that future efforts should concentrate on enhancing ResNet-50 or creating ensemble methods to enhance detection capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/punecon63413.2024.10894868
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Currency Recognition and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of Deep Learning Techniques for Deepfake Classification: A comparative study using ResNet-50 and VGG16

Rohini Jadhav, Kiran Yesugade
2 citations
Currency Recognition and Detection
0.50
article

Implementation of Deep Learning Techniques for Deepfake Classification: A comparative study using ResNet-50 and VGG16

Rohini Jadhav, Kiran Yesugade
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This work investigates the use and assessment of ResNet-50 and VGG16 deep learning models for detecting deepfake images using the Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW) dataset. The methodology encompassed thorough preparation of the dataset and the utilisation of both models to differentiate between authentic and altered facial photos. The models' performance was evaluated using fundamental criteria including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. VGG16 demonstrated superior performance compared to ResNet-50, achieving an accuracy of 93.87%, recall of 96.23%, and an F1 score of 94.41%, while ResNet-50 achieved a precision of 92.54%, recall of 95.26%, and F1 score of 93.88%. Although both models achieved good accuracy, VGG16 had superior stability and generalization across the whole dataset. The study determines that VGG16 is the more dependable model for detecting deepfakes on the LFW dataset. It suggests that future efforts should concentrate on enhancing ResNet-50 or creating ensemble methods to enhance detection capabilities.

Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Currency Recognition and Detection
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementation of Deep Learning Techniques for Deepfake Classification: A comparative study using ResNet-50 and VGG16 — Rohini Jadhav, Kiran Yesugade · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS