Comparison of Path Planning Algorithms for Indoor Static Environment

Indoor path planning application area involves cleaning, surveying, inspection & mobile robotics etc. In this paper, we performed a comparative analysis of number of well-known algorithms for indoor environments, to find the best algorithm providing the shortest path & execution time. The obstacle space was simulated using a 2D environment created using a binary grid map of 200x200 cells, which represents indoor environment features like walls, narrow passages, closed rooms, door openings, etc. Popular methods for path planning include visibility graphs, grid-based methods, sampling-based methods, virtual potential fields, etc. Each of these methods is suitable for a certain environment. Complete path planners like visibility graphs are mathematically complex & impractical for many real systems. Grid-based planners like A* or wavefront planners are easy to implement but are suitable for low-dimensional configuration space. Planners that rely on sampling such as Rapidly-exploring random tree (RRT) & Probabilistic roadmap (PRM) are computationally less expensive than grid-based planners & rely on a random function to choose a sample from configuration space to find obstacle-free space & a simple local planner to connect these samples to move towards a goal. We have selected a variety of algorithms, each representing different path planning criteria involving simple bug behavior, sampling-based planners, distance cost function with a heuristic approach & compared the final results to find a suitable algorithm for the indoor environment. It was observed that sampling based & heuristic-based distance function planner performs best among selected algorithms for the indoor environment under consideration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/punecon63413.2024.10894904
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Path Planning Algorithms for Indoor Static Environment

S. Soumya, Arvind Gautam, S. Jadhav, B Anamika
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

Comparison of Path Planning Algorithms for Indoor Static Environment

S. Soumya, Arvind Gautam, S. Jadhav, B Anamika
article en

Abstract

Indoor path planning application area involves cleaning, surveying, inspection & mobile robotics etc. In this paper, we performed a comparative analysis of number of well-known algorithms for indoor environments, to find the best algorithm providing the shortest path & execution time. The obstacle space was simulated using a 2D environment created using a binary grid map of 200x200 cells, which represents indoor environment features like walls, narrow passages, closed rooms, door openings, etc. Popular methods for path planning include visibility graphs, grid-based methods, sampling-based methods, virtual potential fields, etc. Each of these methods is suitable for a certain environment. Complete path planners like visibility graphs are mathematically complex & impractical for many real systems. Grid-based planners like A* or wavefront planners are easy to implement but are suitable for low-dimensional configuration space. Planners that rely on sampling such as Rapidly-exploring random tree (RRT) & Probabilistic roadmap (PRM) are computationally less expensive than grid-based planners & rely on a random function to choose a sample from configuration space to find obstacle-free space & a simple local planner to connect these samples to move towards a goal. We have selected a variety of algorithms, each representing different path planning criteria involving simple bug behavior, sampling-based planners, distance cost function with a heuristic approach & compared the final results to find a suitable algorithm for the indoor environment. It was observed that sampling based & heuristic-based distance function planner performs best among selected algorithms for the indoor environment under consideration.

Defence Institute of Advanced Technology (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.