Annoying or important? Arguments for and against gender-inclusive language use in German across age and gender

While the use of gender-inclusive language arose as a topic of widespread public debate as early as the 1970s, it has recently gained renewed interest, especially in Germany. The current study uses a questionnaire design to explore the attitudes of 222 native German speakers – across two age groups and several gender identities – regarding gender-inclusive language and the arguments provided for or against its use. The participants make use of seventeen argument categories, most of which have already occupied the debate since the 1980s. However, some new themes also occur, e.g. the issue of context specific use. Overall, themes of inclusivity and language ideology play a larger role for people with positive attitudes, while categories such as language economy and aesthetics are more prevalent for people with negative attitudes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Discrimination
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jld-2024-0103
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Annoying or important? Arguments for and against gender-inclusive language use in German across age and gender

Hanna Bruns, Swantje Leiting
2 citations
Journal of Language and Discrimination
Gender Studies in Language
1.86
article

Annoying or important? Arguments for and against gender-inclusive language use in German across age and gender

Hanna Bruns, Swantje Leiting
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While the use of gender-inclusive language arose as a topic of widespread public debate as early as the 1970s, it has recently gained renewed interest, especially in Germany. The current study uses a questionnaire design to explore the attitudes of 222 native German speakers – across two age groups and several gender identities – regarding gender-inclusive language and the arguments provided for or against its use. The participants make use of seventeen argument categories, most of which have already occupied the debate since the 1980s. However, some new themes also occur, e.g. the issue of context specific use. Overall, themes of inclusivity and language ideology play a larger role for people with positive attitudes, while categories such as language economy and aesthetics are more prevalent for people with negative attitudes.

Journal of Language and DiscriminationVol. 8(2)
University of Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gender Studies in Language
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.