‘Trans is an adjective’ – metalinguistic discourse on the use of <i>trans</i> on Twitter

This study analyses the metalinguistic discourse on trans and the utterance trans is an adjective on Twitter between 2009 and 2022. The aim is to find out which metalinguistic statements about trans and its usage appear in tweets linked to the trans is an adjective discourse and which assumptions about trans and its usage become evident in these statements, to then establish how these statements and assumptions are linked to trans-inclusive and transphobic (linguistic) practice. In the analysis, I observe metasemantic statements – most of which deal with the compound-phrase distinction and spelling – and metapragmatic statements – concerned with social positions and personae. As my analysis will show, both the semantic and the pragmatic aspects of meaning are inseparably linked and equally important when it comes to potentially transphobic language. Furthermore, the results of the study indicate that metasemantic arguments about what the forms refer to are primarily metapragmatic, namely they are about (appropriate) linguistic and social action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Discrimination
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jld-2024-0107
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Trans is an adjective’ – metalinguistic discourse on the use of trans on Twitter

Berit Johannsen
Journal of Language and Discrimination
Digital Communication and Language
article

‘Trans is an adjective’ – metalinguistic discourse on the use of trans on Twitter

Berit Johannsen
article en

Abstract

This study analyses the metalinguistic discourse on trans and the utterance trans is an adjective on Twitter between 2009 and 2022. The aim is to find out which metalinguistic statements about trans and its usage appear in tweets linked to the trans is an adjective discourse and which assumptions about trans and its usage become evident in these statements, to then establish how these statements and assumptions are linked to trans-inclusive and transphobic (linguistic) practice. In the analysis, I observe metasemantic statements – most of which deal with the compound-phrase distinction and spelling – and metapragmatic statements – concerned with social positions and personae. As my analysis will show, both the semantic and the pragmatic aspects of meaning are inseparably linked and equally important when it comes to potentially transphobic language. Furthermore, the results of the study indicate that metasemantic arguments about what the forms refer to are primarily metapragmatic, namely they are about (appropriate) linguistic and social action.

Journal of Language and DiscriminationVol. 8(2)
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.