Forms of Discretion in Russian Legal Theory

Introduction: the paper analyzes the forms of discretion in accordance with the classifications on various grounds proposed by domestic jurists. Judicial discretion is a concept in the Russian legal system that has long attracted the attention of legislators because of its importance to the work of the courts. However, the interpretation of this concept contains many ambiguities that remain relevant to this day. An attempt is made to generalize all forms into a single classification, and appropriate conclusions are drawn on the need for the legislative inclusion of the concept of judicial discretion. The necessity of a comprehensive study of forms of discretion is substantiated. The author’s methods: the methodological framework consists of the methods of historicism, systematics, and comparative law. Results: a unified classification of various forms of discretion is presented. Conclusions: as a result of the study, it is revealed that discretion can be classified in relation to hypothesis, disposition, factual circumstances, and legal consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Concept
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2024.4.21
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forms of Discretion in Russian Legal Theory

Ekaterina Azarova
Legal Concept
Law in Society and Culture
article

Forms of Discretion in Russian Legal Theory

Ekaterina Azarova
article en

Abstract

Introduction: the paper analyzes the forms of discretion in accordance with the classifications on various grounds proposed by domestic jurists. Judicial discretion is a concept in the Russian legal system that has long attracted the attention of legislators because of its importance to the work of the courts. However, the interpretation of this concept contains many ambiguities that remain relevant to this day. An attempt is made to generalize all forms into a single classification, and appropriate conclusions are drawn on the need for the legislative inclusion of the concept of judicial discretion. The necessity of a comprehensive study of forms of discretion is substantiated. The author’s methods: the methodological framework consists of the methods of historicism, systematics, and comparative law. Results: a unified classification of various forms of discretion is presented. Conclusions: as a result of the study, it is revealed that discretion can be classified in relation to hypothesis, disposition, factual circumstances, and legal consequences.

Legal ConceptVol. 23(4)
Volgograd State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.