Concurrent Operant Analysis Validation: A Brief Report

A concurrent operant analysis (COA) employs a simultaneous-treatment design, which arranges simultaneously available reinforcers and measures choice allocation for determinations about the relative reinforcing efficacy between various stimuli. Although many studies have used concurrent operant arrangements to ascertain preferences for interventions, few studies have used this technology to identify functional reinforcers for challenging behavior. We replicated and extended previous research by conducting a COA to identify functional reinforcers maintaining challenging behavior by conducting consecutive comparisons to allow for replication of responding to emerge for an autistic 10-year-old female in a university-affiliated program. We subsequently validated COA results via a reinforcer assessment using an ABAB reversal design. Results indicated escape was a reinforcer for Amelia’s choice allocation in the COA and confirmed as a reinforcer for target responding in the COA validation. This brief report describes the flexibility and use for applying single-case research designs to identify functional reinforcers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Single Case in the Social Sciences
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.1936-9298.2025.2.1.1-10
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concurrent Operant Analysis Validation: A Brief Report

Kayla R. Randall, Andrew J. Bulla, Cameron Long
1 citations
Single Case in the Social Sciences
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
3.44
article

Concurrent Operant Analysis Validation: A Brief Report

Kayla R. Randall, Andrew J. Bulla, Cameron Long
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A concurrent operant analysis (COA) employs a simultaneous-treatment design, which arranges simultaneously available reinforcers and measures choice allocation for determinations about the relative reinforcing efficacy between various stimuli. Although many studies have used concurrent operant arrangements to ascertain preferences for interventions, few studies have used this technology to identify functional reinforcers for challenging behavior. We replicated and extended previous research by conducting a COA to identify functional reinforcers maintaining challenging behavior by conducting consecutive comparisons to allow for replication of responding to emerge for an autistic 10-year-old female in a university-affiliated program. We subsequently validated COA results via a reinforcer assessment using an ABAB reversal design. Results indicated escape was a reinforcer for Amelia’s choice allocation in the COA and confirmed as a reinforcer for target responding in the COA validation. This brief report describes the flexibility and use for applying single-case research designs to identify functional reinforcers.

Single Case in the Social SciencesVol. 2(1)
Armstrong Atlantic State University (US), Georgia Southern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Concurrent Operant Analysis Validation: A Brief Report — Kayla R. Randall, Andrew J. Bulla, et al. · Single Case in the Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS