The Prevalence of Kidd, Lewis, ABO and RhD blood group systems in diabetic patients attending RSUTH

Aim: This study is aimed at determining the prevalence of Kidd, Lewis, ABO and RhD blood group systems in diabetic patients attending RSUTH. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH), and 75 diabetic subjects (30-98 years) was recruited for this study, 5mls of blood was collected using standard venipuncture technique from each subject. Blood grouping were determined manually The presence of ABO, Rh D, Lewis, and Kidd blood group system was examined using Anti-ABO, anti-D, anti-Lea and Leb, anti-Jka and Jkb monoclonal antibody, respectively (Lorne Laboratories). Data generated were analyzed by simple percentage calculation. Result: In this study the distribution pattern of ABO blood group among subjects with diabetes mellitus was in the other of O>A>B>AB (45.3%, 30.7%, 21.3% and 2.7% correspondingly), for Rh blood group system is Rh+> Rh- (95.3% and 4.7%). Also in this study, no subjects was tested Jka+ and Jkb+, the distribution pattern among diabetic groups the distribution of Kidd blood group antigens is Jka+>Jkb+> Jkb- >Jka-is (100%, 94.7%, 5.3%, 0.00 ) respectively. Distribution of Lewis antigens in this study showed the following sequence for diabetes subjects is Leb+>Lea+>Lea->Leb- (81.3%, 60.0%, 40.0%, 18.7%). Conclusion: Le a and Le b in this population was observed frequently than those in other population previously reported We therefore recommend that routine typing of Lewis blood group system should be done.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Innovation in Medicine
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59652/aim.v3i1.379
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prevalence of Kidd, Lewis, ABO and RhD blood group systems in diabetic patients attending RSUTH

Serekara Gideon Christian, Baribefe Banavule Daniel Koate, Esther Joseph
Annals of Innovation in Medicine
Blood groups and transfusion
article

The Prevalence of Kidd, Lewis, ABO and RhD blood group systems in diabetic patients attending RSUTH

Serekara Gideon Christian, Baribefe Banavule Daniel Koate, Esther Joseph
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study is aimed at determining the prevalence of Kidd, Lewis, ABO and RhD blood group systems in diabetic patients attending RSUTH. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH), and 75 diabetic subjects (30-98 years) was recruited for this study, 5mls of blood was collected using standard venipuncture technique from each subject. Blood grouping were determined manually The presence of ABO, Rh D, Lewis, and Kidd blood group system was examined using Anti-ABO, anti-D, anti-Lea and Leb, anti-Jka and Jkb monoclonal antibody, respectively (Lorne Laboratories). Data generated were analyzed by simple percentage calculation. Result: In this study the distribution pattern of ABO blood group among subjects with diabetes mellitus was in the other of O>A>B>AB (45.3%, 30.7%, 21.3% and 2.7% correspondingly), for Rh blood group system is Rh+> Rh- (95.3% and 4.7%). Also in this study, no subjects was tested Jka+ and Jkb+, the distribution pattern among diabetic groups the distribution of Kidd blood group antigens is Jka+>Jkb+> Jkb- >Jka-is (100%, 94.7%, 5.3%, 0.00 ) respectively. Distribution of Lewis antigens in this study showed the following sequence for diabetes subjects is Leb+>Lea+>Lea->Leb- (81.3%, 60.0%, 40.0%, 18.7%). Conclusion: Le a and Le b in this population was observed frequently than those in other population previously reported We therefore recommend that routine typing of Lewis blood group system should be done.

Annals of Innovation in MedicineVol. 3(1)
Rivers State University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.