“When Honesty is Good, for Imitation is Bad”: Strategies for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Russian Higher Education Institutions

The issue of using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education is the focus of both its advocates and critics. The world academic community is trying to consider the rapidly spreading phenomenon, to determine its place in the educational process and to work out the regulatory framework. The application of GenAI-powered services changes conceptual and didactic foundations of education. In order to predict scenarios of university education development and timely response on the managerial level, the community needs survey data on the use of GenAI-powered services and tools by the educational process actors – university academic staff and students. The paper contributes to the study of patterns of GenAI-powered services use by students and university teachers. The authors surveyed students ( N = 450), researchers and teaching staff ( N = 228) of the Moscow City University. The greater popularity of GenAI among students and a more discreet position on the use of GenAI-powered services by university teachers is determined by different strategies of their use. The complementary function of GenAI-powered services in the active strategy of a university teacher does not change the essence of the educational process compared to the students’ one. The accomplishment of written assignments with the help of GenAI as the most common application of GenAI-powered tools among students transforms the conventional understanding of responsibility and transparency of educational results. The findings highlight the reconsideration of higher education nature and require to transform educational practices in teaching and learning. The authors conclude that the contradictory attitudes towards GenAI require the assumption of ethical and regulatory norms for the use of GenAI-powered services in (higher) education, as well as increasing the level of AI literacy among teachers and students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-31-50
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“When Honesty is Good, for Imitation is Bad”: Strategies for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Russian Higher Education Institutions

Igor Remorenko, Р.В. Комаров, D. P. Ananin
14 citations
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
9.16
article

“When Honesty is Good, for Imitation is Bad”: Strategies for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Russian Higher Education Institutions

Igor Remorenko, Р.В. Комаров, D. P. Ananin
article en
14 citations

Abstract

The issue of using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education is the focus of both its advocates and critics. The world academic community is trying to consider the rapidly spreading phenomenon, to determine its place in the educational process and to work out the regulatory framework. The application of GenAI-powered services changes conceptual and didactic foundations of education. In order to predict scenarios of university education development and timely response on the managerial level, the community needs survey data on the use of GenAI-powered services and tools by the educational process actors – university academic staff and students. The paper contributes to the study of patterns of GenAI-powered services use by students and university teachers. The authors surveyed students ( N = 450), researchers and teaching staff ( N = 228) of the Moscow City University. The greater popularity of GenAI among students and a more discreet position on the use of GenAI-powered services by university teachers is determined by different strategies of their use. The complementary function of GenAI-powered services in the active strategy of a university teacher does not change the essence of the educational process compared to the students’ one. The accomplishment of written assignments with the help of GenAI as the most common application of GenAI-powered tools among students transforms the conventional understanding of responsibility and transparency of educational results. The findings highlight the reconsideration of higher education nature and require to transform educational practices in teaching and learning. The authors conclude that the contradictory attitudes towards GenAI require the assumption of ethical and regulatory norms for the use of GenAI-powered services in (higher) education, as well as increasing the level of AI literacy among teachers and students.

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in RussiaVol. 34(2)
Moscow City University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
9.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.