Exploratory Bifactor Analysis of Symptoms and Traits Highlights Aspects of Psychopathology Inaccessible by Other Methods

Bifactor analysis has the distinct ability to model general versus specific psychopathology liabilities and the extent to which these liabilities are involved in manifest symptoms. However, overreliance on confirmatory models of diagnostic covariance hampers substantive implications. We undertook an exploratory bifactor approach to symptom-level epidemiological data ( N = 8,405) to critically examine known issues in bifactor analysis and contribute to the development of more finely grained psychopathology models. The resulting model included Distress, Harmful Alcohol Use, Antisocial Behavior, Attention Seeking, Social Alienation, and Psychosis specific factors. Within diagnostic categories, symptoms showed substantial heterogeneity regarding their degree of generality versus specificity and in their primary loadings on specific factors. Results clarify the extent to which shortcomings of bifactor models persist beyond the limitations of diagnosis-level data and/or confirmatory methods. These findings suggest additional layers of complexity and nuance to quantitative dimensional taxonomies and offer new insights into critical debates in the bifactor literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241308861
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploratory Bifactor Analysis of Symptoms and Traits Highlights Aspects of Psychopathology Inaccessible by Other Methods

Lee Anna Clark, David Watson, Holly Frances Levin-Aspenson, David A. Smith
Clinical Psychological Science
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Exploratory Bifactor Analysis of Symptoms and Traits Highlights Aspects of Psychopathology Inaccessible by Other Methods

Lee Anna Clark, David Watson, Holly Frances Levin-Aspenson, David A. Smith
article en

Abstract

Bifactor analysis has the distinct ability to model general versus specific psychopathology liabilities and the extent to which these liabilities are involved in manifest symptoms. However, overreliance on confirmatory models of diagnostic covariance hampers substantive implications. We undertook an exploratory bifactor approach to symptom-level epidemiological data ( N = 8,405) to critically examine known issues in bifactor analysis and contribute to the development of more finely grained psychopathology models. The resulting model included Distress, Harmful Alcohol Use, Antisocial Behavior, Attention Seeking, Social Alienation, and Psychosis specific factors. Within diagnostic categories, symptoms showed substantial heterogeneity regarding their degree of generality versus specificity and in their primary loadings on specific factors. Results clarify the extent to which shortcomings of bifactor models persist beyond the limitations of diagnosis-level data and/or confirmatory methods. These findings suggest additional layers of complexity and nuance to quantitative dimensional taxonomies and offer new insights into critical debates in the bifactor literature.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 13(4)
University of Notre Dame (US), University of North Texas (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.