Artificial Intelligence in the Mirror of Education: The Problem of Dialogue

The meanings and goals of mass education are to transfer pedagogically adapted social experience from teacher to student. Such education has the character of transmission and is therefore monologue-like; it reflects the idea of a person as a “blank sheet”. However, experience and knowledge cannot be conveyed directly; they are formed from within. The transfer of impersonal information in a ready-made form does not take into account the personal characteristics, meanings and goals of the student himself, who does not participate in the creation of knowledge. This approach leads to the training of a specialist prone to imitation, which helps to accelerate the historical process, leads to the atomization of personality and increased aggression. Artificial intelligence, performing an increasing number of functions for humans, saves them time and facilitates professional and personal actions by facilitating the transfer of information, which many people may consuder a sinonom of a “knowledge”. Can artificial intelligence not only serve as a generator of solutions to student’s needs, but also help identify, unlock and realize their potential? In other words, can it support the student in a subject-to-subject interaction with other students and teachers within the framework of dialogical education? Monologue education and artificial intelligence have one important feature in common – the lack of internal creativity. We believe that artificial intelligence cannot be a subject due to the lack of boundaries, since new meanings are always born in dialogue based on the self of the subjects. Artificial intelligence does not have an internal space of meanings, which is the basic condition for dialogue. Artificial intelligence enhances the negative features of monologue education. It makes a person’s life easier, but it does so by reducing opportunities for their development. Heuristic-type education, dialogical in nature, acts as a student’s assistant in his creative selfrealization and develops the qualities of a creator’s personality capable of effective interaction with artificial intelligence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-125-135
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in the Mirror of Education: The Problem of Dialogue

Andrei Karol, Elena Bushmanova
3 citations
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia
Digital Transformation in Law
9.26
article

Artificial Intelligence in the Mirror of Education: The Problem of Dialogue

Andrei Karol, Elena Bushmanova
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The meanings and goals of mass education are to transfer pedagogically adapted social experience from teacher to student. Such education has the character of transmission and is therefore monologue-like; it reflects the idea of a person as a “blank sheet”. However, experience and knowledge cannot be conveyed directly; they are formed from within. The transfer of impersonal information in a ready-made form does not take into account the personal characteristics, meanings and goals of the student himself, who does not participate in the creation of knowledge. This approach leads to the training of a specialist prone to imitation, which helps to accelerate the historical process, leads to the atomization of personality and increased aggression. Artificial intelligence, performing an increasing number of functions for humans, saves them time and facilitates professional and personal actions by facilitating the transfer of information, which many people may consuder a sinonom of a “knowledge”. Can artificial intelligence not only serve as a generator of solutions to student’s needs, but also help identify, unlock and realize their potential? In other words, can it support the student in a subject-to-subject interaction with other students and teachers within the framework of dialogical education? Monologue education and artificial intelligence have one important feature in common – the lack of internal creativity. We believe that artificial intelligence cannot be a subject due to the lack of boundaries, since new meanings are always born in dialogue based on the self of the subjects. Artificial intelligence does not have an internal space of meanings, which is the basic condition for dialogue. Artificial intelligence enhances the negative features of monologue education. It makes a person’s life easier, but it does so by reducing opportunities for their development. Heuristic-type education, dialogical in nature, acts as a student’s assistant in his creative selfrealization and develops the qualities of a creator’s personality capable of effective interaction with artificial intelligence.

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in RussiaVol. 34(2)
Belarusian State University (BY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Transformation in Law
9.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.