Comparison of Effectiveness of Machine Learning Methods in Predicting Chemical Compound Toxicity Enhance Pharmaceutical Product Safety

This study compares the effectiveness of machine learning methods in predicting the toxicity of chemical compounds using a dataset containing 5,000 samples with 14 key features. The dataset underwent preprocessing, including normalization, missing data handling, and oversampling to address data imbalance. The models used include Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extra Trees, and Gradient Boosting, validated using k-fold cross-validation. Evaluation based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score showed that Gradient Boosting achieved the best performance with 92.3% accuracy, though it still faces challenges such as overfitting and interpretability limitations. Compared to in vitro and in vivo methods, machine learning is more efficient but still requires further experimental validation. This study recommends optimizing models through ensemble learning and explainable AI to improve prediction reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Informatika
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35314/emkzcz13
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Effectiveness of Machine Learning Methods in Predicting Chemical Compound Toxicity Enhance Pharmaceutical Product Safety

Hendy Kurniawan, Pulung Nurtantio Andono, Dufan Yuwana
INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Informatika
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Comparison of Effectiveness of Machine Learning Methods in Predicting Chemical Compound Toxicity Enhance Pharmaceutical Product Safety

Hendy Kurniawan, Pulung Nurtantio Andono, Dufan Yuwana
article en

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of machine learning methods in predicting the toxicity of chemical compounds using a dataset containing 5,000 samples with 14 key features. The dataset underwent preprocessing, including normalization, missing data handling, and oversampling to address data imbalance. The models used include Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extra Trees, and Gradient Boosting, validated using k-fold cross-validation. Evaluation based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score showed that Gradient Boosting achieved the best performance with 92.3% accuracy, though it still faces challenges such as overfitting and interpretability limitations. Compared to in vitro and in vivo methods, machine learning is more efficient but still requires further experimental validation. This study recommends optimizing models through ensemble learning and explainable AI to improve prediction reliability.

INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri InformatikaVol. 10(1)
Universitas Dian Nuswantoro (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.