What is robot abuse? A sociotechnical definition

Robot abuse encompasses a range of actions enacted by users against robots that resemble aggressive actions enacted by humans against each other. Research in this area faces numerous challenges due to ethical concerns and methodological limitations. Despite preliminary indications of robot abuse, most people are still not personally familiar with robots but hold collective imaginaries promoted by science fiction. Little is known about how abuse will manifest in practice, and research is in dire need of operational and theoretical definitions. As a response, this paper applies theory-driven speculative design to collect imaginaries of robot abuse with a sample of university students (N = 69). The inductive analysis revealed four behavioural patterns (Outburst, Clash, Oppression, and Rebellion) that were then operationalised in the orthogonal space defined by the Function of Aggression (reactive vs. proactive) and Robot Identity (object vs. subject). We ground the Space of Robot Abuse on the General Aggression Model and a sociotechnical definition of robots, provide a method for designing storyboards and evaluate them. We conclude by advancing a sociotechnical definition of robot abuse, which could interest researchers and designers alike.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour and Information Technology
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2025.2462268
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is robot abuse? A sociotechnical definition

Antonella De Angeli, Brad J. Bushman, María Menéndez-Blanco, Andrea Rezzani
5 citations
Behaviour and Information Technology
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
12.19
article

What is robot abuse? A sociotechnical definition

Antonella De Angeli, Brad J. Bushman, María Menéndez-Blanco, Andrea Rezzani
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Robot abuse encompasses a range of actions enacted by users against robots that resemble aggressive actions enacted by humans against each other. Research in this area faces numerous challenges due to ethical concerns and methodological limitations. Despite preliminary indications of robot abuse, most people are still not personally familiar with robots but hold collective imaginaries promoted by science fiction. Little is known about how abuse will manifest in practice, and research is in dire need of operational and theoretical definitions. As a response, this paper applies theory-driven speculative design to collect imaginaries of robot abuse with a sample of university students (N = 69). The inductive analysis revealed four behavioural patterns (Outburst, Clash, Oppression, and Rebellion) that were then operationalised in the orthogonal space defined by the Function of Aggression (reactive vs. proactive) and Robot Identity (object vs. subject). We ground the Space of Robot Abuse on the General Aggression Model and a sociotechnical definition of robots, provide a method for designing storyboards and evaluate them. We conclude by advancing a sociotechnical definition of robot abuse, which could interest researchers and designers alike.

Behaviour and Information Technology
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
12.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.