Comparison of Classification Algorithm Accuracy Levels in Phishing Detection

ABSTRACT Phishing attacks have become a serious threat in the realm of cybersecurity, with both direct and indirect impacts on individuals and organizations. This study aims to assess the performance of three machine learning classification algorithms—Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine—in detecting phishing attempts through the use of suitable datasets. The study focuses on comparing the performance of these algorithms to determine their accuracy and reliability in phishing detection. The experimental findings indicated that Random Forest attained the highest accuracy, reaching 96.675%, followed by Decision Tree (93.57%), while Support Vector Machine showed lower performance (54.724%). Cohen's Kappa also indicated that Random Forest had the highest correlation value. In conclusion, for this dataset, Random Forest and Decision Tree are more effective at detecting phishing attacks compared to Support Vector Machine.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Computer Science and Software Engineering
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63254/acsse.v1i1.18
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Classification Algorithm Accuracy Levels in Phishing Detection

Dewi Fortuna, Bahriddin Abapihi
Applied Computer Science and Software Engineering
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Comparison of Classification Algorithm Accuracy Levels in Phishing Detection

Dewi Fortuna, Bahriddin Abapihi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Phishing attacks have become a serious threat in the realm of cybersecurity, with both direct and indirect impacts on individuals and organizations. This study aims to assess the performance of three machine learning classification algorithms—Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine—in detecting phishing attempts through the use of suitable datasets. The study focuses on comparing the performance of these algorithms to determine their accuracy and reliability in phishing detection. The experimental findings indicated that Random Forest attained the highest accuracy, reaching 96.675%, followed by Decision Tree (93.57%), while Support Vector Machine showed lower performance (54.724%). Cohen's Kappa also indicated that Random Forest had the highest correlation value. In conclusion, for this dataset, Random Forest and Decision Tree are more effective at detecting phishing attacks compared to Support Vector Machine.

Applied Computer Science and Software EngineeringVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Classification Algorithm Accuracy Levels in Phishing Detection — Dewi Fortuna, Bahriddin Abapihi · Applied Computer Science and Software Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS