Predictive models on patients’ eligibility for peritoneal dialysis

BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD) is being promoted because it is cost-effective and has equivalent outcomes to facility-based hemodialysis (HD). Determining PD eligibility is critical but subjective, with high variability among renal programs. This study aimed to establish a predictive model for PD eligibility among individuals who started treatment with HD. A secondary objective was to identify predictors of PD eligibility and determine if eligible patients went on to receive PD.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included individuals starting HD at multiple hospitals in Alberta, Canada, as part of the START program between 1 October 2016 and 31 March 2018. Twenty-seven predictors, including patient characteristics, laboratory values, and comorbidities, were considered in logistic regression modeling. The outcome variable was PD eligibility, as determined by a standardized interdisciplinary assessment. The model selection was based on the Akaike information criterion. The confusion matrix was used for each model to compare the predicted versus observed eligibility. The final model was calibrated and presented.ResultsAmong the 598 participants, 391 (65.4%) were considered eligible for PD. The logistic regression model achieved a modest performance in discriminating patients who were eligible for PD, with a high sensitivity of 91.3%, an accuracy of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.65-0.72), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.69 to 0.71. Age (OR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), body mass index (OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97), starting dialysis in intensive care unit (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.92), and polycystic kidney disease (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.13-0.99) were statistically significant factors associated with a lower likelihood of being considered eligible for PD. Out of the 391 eligible PD patients, 87 (22.3%) received PD treatment within 6 months of starting HD.ConclusionsThe majority of patients starting HD were considered eligible for PD. Our model exhibits a high level of sensitivity and could serve as a valuable tool for screening potential candidates following the commencement of HD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251317463
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive models on patients’ eligibility for peritoneal dialysis

Yang Yang, Matthew J. Oliver, Joel A. Dubin, Helen Chen et al.
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Predictive models on patients’ eligibility for peritoneal dialysis

Yang Yang, Matthew J. Oliver, Joel A. Dubin, Helen Chen, Robert R. Quinn
article en

Abstract

BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD) is being promoted because it is cost-effective and has equivalent outcomes to facility-based hemodialysis (HD). Determining PD eligibility is critical but subjective, with high variability among renal programs. This study aimed to establish a predictive model for PD eligibility among individuals who started treatment with HD. A secondary objective was to identify predictors of PD eligibility and determine if eligible patients went on to receive PD.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included individuals starting HD at multiple hospitals in Alberta, Canada, as part of the START program between 1 October 2016 and 31 March 2018. Twenty-seven predictors, including patient characteristics, laboratory values, and comorbidities, were considered in logistic regression modeling. The outcome variable was PD eligibility, as determined by a standardized interdisciplinary assessment. The model selection was based on the Akaike information criterion. The confusion matrix was used for each model to compare the predicted versus observed eligibility. The final model was calibrated and presented.ResultsAmong the 598 participants, 391 (65.4%) were considered eligible for PD. The logistic regression model achieved a modest performance in discriminating patients who were eligible for PD, with a high sensitivity of 91.3%, an accuracy of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.65-0.72), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.69 to 0.71. Age (OR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), body mass index (OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97), starting dialysis in intensive care unit (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.92), and polycystic kidney disease (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.13-0.99) were statistically significant factors associated with a lower likelihood of being considered eligible for PD. Out of the 391 eligible PD patients, 87 (22.3%) received PD treatment within 6 months of starting HD.ConclusionsThe majority of patients starting HD were considered eligible for PD. Our model exhibits a high level of sensitivity and could serve as a valuable tool for screening potential candidates following the commencement of HD.

Peritoneal Dialysis InternationalVol. 46(2)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Mitacs
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.