Absolute and relative reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) assessment in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain

This study investigates the intra- and interrater reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold assessments in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain, focusing on chronic and subacute stages. A sample of 26 adults was evaluated using a mechanical algometer across six anatomical points. Intrarater and interrater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results demonstrated almost perfect reliability for both intrarater (ICC range: 0.96-0.99) and interrater (ICC range: 0.92-0.99) assessments. Standard error of measurement and MDC values for intrarater reliability showed clinically acceptable error, except for the upper trapezius and mid-deltoid, where MDC value exceeded 25% of the grand mean, suggesting reduced precision between nonspecific shoulder pain stages. For interrater reliability, the adductor pollicis brevis, upper trapezius, and infraspinatus also showed less precision, with MDC values exceeding 25% of the grand mean, particularly in chronic patients. Despite these findings, no significant differences were observed between the subacute and chronic groups. While relative reliability was high, the findings highlight the need for caution in interpreting absolute reliability, especially for inter-rater assessments at specific muscle sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shoulder & Elbow
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251319739
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Absolute and relative reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) assessment in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain

Vasileios Korakakis, P. Kyriakou, Kyriakos Pavlou, George M. Pamboris et al.
2 citations
Shoulder & Elbow
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
article

Absolute and relative reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) assessment in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain

Vasileios Korakakis, P. Kyriakou, Kyriakos Pavlou, George M. Pamboris, Antonis Constantinou, Christos Karagiannis, George Ploutarchou, Christos Savva
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the intra- and interrater reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold assessments in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain, focusing on chronic and subacute stages. A sample of 26 adults was evaluated using a mechanical algometer across six anatomical points. Intrarater and interrater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results demonstrated almost perfect reliability for both intrarater (ICC range: 0.96-0.99) and interrater (ICC range: 0.92-0.99) assessments. Standard error of measurement and MDC values for intrarater reliability showed clinically acceptable error, except for the upper trapezius and mid-deltoid, where MDC value exceeded 25% of the grand mean, suggesting reduced precision between nonspecific shoulder pain stages. For interrater reliability, the adductor pollicis brevis, upper trapezius, and infraspinatus also showed less precision, with MDC values exceeding 25% of the grand mean, particularly in chronic patients. Despite these findings, no significant differences were observed between the subacute and chronic groups. While relative reliability was high, the findings highlight the need for caution in interpreting absolute reliability, especially for inter-rater assessments at specific muscle sites.

Shoulder & ElbowVol. 18(1)
University of Nicosia (CY), European University Cyprus (CY), Frederick University (CY)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.