Cross-Border E-Crimes: Jurisdiction and Due Process Challenges

Cross-border e-crimes pose significant challenges due to the borderless nature of cyberspace and the complexities of international legal cooperation. This research examines the existing international legal frameworks, such as the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, and their effectiveness in harmonizing laws and facilitating cross-border investigations. The study applies the doctrinal research methodology to analyze the regulations on cybercrimes. It analyzes the role of international standards of due process and prosecution in upholding individual rights and ensuring fair trials in cross-border cases. The legal frameworks for collecting and sharing digital evidence across borders are fragmented, creating significant challenges for international cooperation. Emerging technologies further complicate the governance of cybercrime. Law enforcement agencies face legal and privacy issues when accessing cross-border data stored in the cloud. The execution of mutual legal assistance requests in cybercrime cases remains slow and inefficient. Gaps in international frameworks hinder lawful access to electronic evidence, while cross-border cybercrime investigations experience delays due to language barriers, incompatible laws, and limited technical expertise within national agencies. These challenges underscore the need for a unified approach to tackle cross-border e-crimes effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ADLIYA Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38633
Citations
10
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
85.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Border E-Crimes: Jurisdiction and Due Process Challenges

Naeem AllahRakha
10 citations
ADLIYA Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
85.22
article

Cross-Border E-Crimes: Jurisdiction and Due Process Challenges

Naeem AllahRakha
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Cross-border e-crimes pose significant challenges due to the borderless nature of cyberspace and the complexities of international legal cooperation. This research examines the existing international legal frameworks, such as the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, and their effectiveness in harmonizing laws and facilitating cross-border investigations. The study applies the doctrinal research methodology to analyze the regulations on cybercrimes. It analyzes the role of international standards of due process and prosecution in upholding individual rights and ensuring fair trials in cross-border cases. The legal frameworks for collecting and sharing digital evidence across borders are fragmented, creating significant challenges for international cooperation. Emerging technologies further complicate the governance of cybercrime. Law enforcement agencies face legal and privacy issues when accessing cross-border data stored in the cloud. The execution of mutual legal assistance requests in cybercrime cases remains slow and inefficient. Gaps in international frameworks hinder lawful access to electronic evidence, while cross-border cybercrime investigations experience delays due to language barriers, incompatible laws, and limited technical expertise within national agencies. These challenges underscore the need for a unified approach to tackle cross-border e-crimes effectively.

ADLIYA Jurnal Hukum dan KemanusiaanVol. 18(2)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
85.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.